Talk:Rake (poker)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Rake (poker) is part of WikiProject Gambling, an attempt at building a useful gambling resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).
edit

This article is part of WikiProject Poker, an attempt at building a useful poker resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page.

[edit] Re-added rake free concept 10/20/2006

After a long and thoughtful debate regarding the existence of rake free cardrooms, it has been decided that the "rakefree" article should be merged into the "rake" article. Please keep the idea in this article, so as to preclude the need for a separate "rake free" article. Please see AfD/Rakefree for more information and an archive of the debate.Cloudreaver 15:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Added definition and links to rake free cardrooms

The reader deserves to know this information, which is highly beneficial to the poker-playing public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloudreaver (talk • contribs)

I don't think that adding links to online cardrooms in this particular article is appropriate. Since the article is about the rake, it would make as much sense to list online cardrooms which DO collect a rake as it does to list online cardrooms which don't. Rray 22:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Rake is a concept. No rake, rake free, or any other way of saying "abscense of rake" is just that. This article is certainly not for specififying the rake structures of online cardrooms. Articles about cardrooms can talk about whatever their features might be. 2005 23:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

There is definitely a difference between the concept of rake and rakefree. It is the same delineation as that between "care" and "carefree". Keep the two articles separate. Do not impose your personal bias and POV on others. Cloudreaver 22:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

This is not a matter of personal bias and POV, but of simple common sense. It's not a notable enough concept to warrant a separate article. Rray 10:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The 'Mechanisms' section classifies a monthly subscription fee as a form of rake, which I agree with, so I don't think it makes sense to describe such a cardroom as 'Rake free' later in the article. —Kymacpherson 12:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Good point. Nice edit. Rray 16:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

May I ask why you removed my link to an article which is btw more relevant than this wikipedia article + the three outbounds that are on it?!

This article doesn't exist for you to drop gby and spam your website. If you think this article can be improved, do so. 2005 08:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh I see, only you can spam your web site here...sorry won't happend again.