User talk:Raijinili

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Fansites

I was referring to Wikipedia:External links --Squilibob 02:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lacrima Castle

May I ask what you're doing with this article? You create it with the comment that it probably will be deleted, then alternate between improving it and recommending its deletion. If you really don't think it belongs on Wikipedia, you can just add the {{db-user}} tag to the article and have it removed. ~Matticus TC 19:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Some people wanted that article, and I'm torn between helping them and being realistic. I have an idea though. --Raijinili 19:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Forums as sources

From WP:RS: "posts to bulletin boards etc should not be used... no way of knowing who has written or posted them... and no editorial oversight or third-party fact-checking". Axem Titanium 20:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

The point is, we don't know who it actually is and whether or not this person's information represents Atlus' information. Axem Titanium 20:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Ummmm... why are you asking me? It's already done and it's being localized right now. I thought we were talking about using this guy's forum post as a source for a release date, not whether the game is still in development or not. Axem Titanium 20:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
What are you talking about? I agree that the game is no longer in development. I recently reverted a release date added by an anonymous editor because it had no reliable source information. If you're still referring to the forum admin thing, what he says cannot be considered the stance of the company as a whole because it hasn't made any official announcements about it. It cannot be verified, hence the part about editorial oversight and third-party fact-checking. Axem Titanium 20:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Andy Richter

Aww, crap, I'm stupid for not reading that. Thanks for catching that, and I reverted myself. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Questions on IDT Energy and ITD Corp

You've recently posed two questions regarding IDT Corp. on the article's talk page. This is just a quick note to let you know i've responded and I hope my answers give you enough information and detail to deal with the questions. If you need some more help, don't hesitate to drop me a line via my talk page. thewinchester 15:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] .hack//AI buster

Let's talk about it on the discussion page. Kazu-kun 16:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: My rvv on Utawarerumono

While I do realize it wasn't exactly vandalism on the editors part, there have been several edits in the past related to Revised Hepburn romanization, the correct English romanization by ADV Films of Erurū/Elulū's name and the fact if the twin archers Dori and Gura are male or female, so I just lumped all three into one and did a quick "rvv" summary as a way to discourage other editors who know that ackronym means "Revert vandalism" from editing it back to how it was altered by the editor in question.--(十八) 06:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: My duplicate/orphaned Ouran image (and other images that may arise)

I thank you for the cleaning up of any images I may have uploaded in the past which are now orphaned for one reason or another, though know that when you post the notice on my talk page, I'm going to send it to the archive since it clutters up the page and makes it look bad. So any further action you take on my past images I won't stop. Delete them by abiding by Wikipedia policy and informing which ones you intend to delete in case I want to save it before it gets taken off the server.--(十八) 04:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Castle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)