User talk:Raidcrisis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Resistance: 2

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Resistance: 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, Raidcrisis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 青い(Aoi) (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Rosa Parks on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - BanyanTree 22:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

When another user is making a mistake, it's normally far more productive to point it out to them, rather than revert warring. The dates in parenthesis are mandated by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death, so I have reintroduced them. I didn't scroll down to see your second productive change in my initial review, for which I apologize. A note on my talk, your talk page here, the article talk page or an explanation in your edit summary would have reduced the risk of raising the level of drama. Happy editing, BanyanTree 07:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to D-Generation X, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Headline states how DX feels/thinks about RAW going HD. They, nor does WWE, state that DX is returning next week to RAW. TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 00:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DX on HD? That does not mean they have returned and that is a small segment not notable to the article stop adding before you violate the 3RR rule TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 01:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Umm, you are violating the 3RR rule by reverting constructive edits. I have refrained from reverting your edits, other users are reverting your edits. One more revert and you might be blocked from Wikipedia.TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 01:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Raidcrisis, do you just ignore others when editing? The source you provided for ECW getting new sets is a messageboard (messageboards are usually considered unreliable sources). On top of that, it's just a reposting of WWE's press release, the same press release that only mentions RAW and SmackDown getting new sets (it does NOT mention ECW getting a new set). TJ Spyke 01:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the WP:3RR rule. You reverted for the 5th time after Truco's two warnings. If you violate this rule in the future, it will result in a longer block. Thanks. Nikki311 01:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shawn Michaels. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Don't add nonsense to the Shawn Michaels article, if you do, then I will report you and have you blocked once more. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)