Talk:RailCorp Transit Officer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RailCorp Transit Officer article.

Article policies
Flag
Portal
RailCorp Transit Officer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
RailCorp Transit Officer is within the scope of the Law Enforcement WikiProject. Please Join, Create, and Assess. Remember, the project aims for no vandalism and no conflict, if an article needs attention regarding vandalism or breaches of wikiquette, please add it to the article watch list.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

| A big pile of "citation required" here... something from the Rail Act itself would be good, given how unreliable CityRail information is.

[edit] Cleanup

Starting major cleanup of article. --Mikecraig 03:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure we really need an article for Transit Officers. Maybe it could be merged with the RailCorp page.Grizzlybear82 07:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ranks

I've added rank insignia to the page, but was unable to find a precise title to go with each rank. Anybody knowledgeable enough to add them? DirectEdge (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I've added the titles. Not so sure about their accuracy though as there are conflicting sources. I picked to source that was most corroborated by the others, however. Next time I see a Transit, I'll ask them about it. DirectEdge (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Powers

Recent edits to the powers section have not been well-referenced and have made statements that are not encyclopaedic in nature. I have removed them accordingly. If factual information was incorrectly removed, I apologise and ask that you reinstate it with the requisite citation so that it may be verified. This is a contentious topic within the community and it is therefore doubly imperative that Wikipedia's article on the subject is reliable in that it is verifiable and lacks conjecture and hearsay. Lineface (talk) 04:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)