User talk:Radioheadhst

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Panama Canal

Hi, Thanks for your very useful contributions to the articles relating to the Panama Canal. Did you know that the main article is in peer review? Comments welcome. — Johantheghost 12:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I thought you might be interested to know that I've put Panama Canal up for FA status. Feel free to comment or vote. — Johantheghost 16:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Centennial Bridge, Panama

Thanks for adding the real opening date — do you have a source for that, so we could cite it? Cheers. — Johantheghost 12:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

"I thank you for your hard work in these pages about my country" — so you're from Panama? I love Panama! I sailed my boat through the canal, and into the San Blas islands, and had a few great months there — I wish I'd had more time to explore the country. I couldn't believe how friendly everyone was, even the port captain, agricultural inspector, and the migracion officers! Great place, and I hope I can get back there one day — I'm freezing in Scotland right now! — Johantheghost 19:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Day of the Martyrs

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Martyrs' Day, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -- Perfecto  05:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thumbnail sizes

Hi again, I notice you changed the thumbnail sizes in Bridge of the Americas. Until recently, I did the same thing myself, but it's actually bad style, and I am now removing all thumbnail sizes from the canal articles. Individual users can set their preferred thumbnail size in their preferences — go to "preferences", select "files", and select your preferrred size. The problem is that if you set the size in the article, then it overrides the user's preference, and they don't get the size they want. This should only be done if an image really needs to be displayed in a certain size. So, I'll take out the sizes, and if you want larger thumbnails, please change your preferences. Cheers! — Johantheghost 12:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Porto Bello

I noticed you corrected the spelling — how could I have missed that after the fantastic few days I had in Portobelo! Anyhow, I was just wondering — is "Porto Bello" the original, historic spelling? If so, would it be worth saying "... or Porto Bello, as it was known then", or something? Cheers. — Johantheghost 11:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I have always known it as Portobelo, I have seen it written as Porto Bello on foreign texts, but here it is always Portobelo. I happen to have a 2 volume book called "los viajes de Colón", its very interesting and i will write you a short translation of what they say about Portobelo so you can quote it or just read it: "On november 2, 1502 Columbus reached Portobelo. He named it like that because, as don Fernando - Columbus brother - says "its very big and so beautiful, with a small population. Its like a painting and its the most beautiful place I have ever seen"". The complete source is: Taviani, Paolo. Los viajes de Colón. Volume 2, page 299. Planeta-De Agostini Editorial. Barcelona, 1989. - Well, i couldn't agree more with Columbus, its really a beautiful port, as you know. I hope it can be developed someday as it deserves. Radioheadhst 03:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for that — I think I've been mislead by some of those foreign texts. It is absolutely a beautiful port! I got there in 2004, and just happened to be there for the driving out of the devils, which was fascinating. If you're interested, check out my pictures and log. Cheers! — Johantheghost 11:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vaya saludo!

Es increíble que un panameño esté por estos lares, digamos que usuarios como tú son los que necesitamos en es.wiki; tanto tú como yo estamos haciendo labores en paralelo, sería bueno al menos buscar un trabajo en dúo. Cualquiera cosa, dejame el mensaje en mi discusión en es.wiki. Un saludo de otro panameño. --Taichi 08:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Pues es triste que se haya liado eso, yo opino que debemos hacer el artículo en español, pero debemos primero hacerlo a partir de un borrador, pienso que el artículo en inglés minimiza los factores de oposición. Yo, siendote sincero me opongo al proyecto y soy del No, sin embargo, pienso que como deber hay que explicar ambos puntos de vista con el mismo nivel de objetividad. El único inconveniente es que no podré dedicar todo el día con el artículo, ahora tengo en mira destacar cuatro artículo en es.wiki, aunque como te dije puedo ayudarte cuando pueda y asistir en algunas cosas. Un saludo. --Taichi 01:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AYUDA

Pienso que como muchas personas yo ingrese a participar en Wikipedia muy animadamente, sin embargo me tope con una gran traba, los wikipedistas que se creen dueños del saber y esta web, yo soy un novato en wikipedia y las veces que he entrado me dedico mas a procurar ver como arreglo la web de una artista joven latina, que viene sobresaliendo en el mundo del espectaculo.

Me parecio lindo poder colocar una biografia de ella, pero mi colaboracion primero llevo el irrelevante, no si el arte sea irrelevante o es irrelevante porque es una propuesta de un extraño... bueno en fin , luego de irrelevante paso a copy nose que? pero de alli le quitaron ese calñificativo y paso a votacion para borrado ???? whath??? y mas contrariado cuando dicen que pse puede editar bien para que no sea eliminado, porque no usan el tiempo en corregior los trabajos malos en vez de usarlo para crear foros y otros? porque no le dicen a uno como corregir los trabajos????

Luego veo quienes solicitan el borrado, al parecer gente que les gusta les llamen duquesa, excelencia, divinidad??? queeeee, esta es una pagina que pretende revolucionar la educacion??? hacer que persista el por siempre las cosas que deben de serlo??? no me parece que sea el criterio usado el mejor ç, usted como uno de los lideres por favor ayude para que existan estos cambios en la conducta de los administradores, bibliotecarios y en fin

Bueno sino nuevamente perdi el tiempo aca en este reino de brujas, condes, duquesas y reyes del saber :(

Ahhhhh mi contribucion fue sobre Mia Rauz

indignodewiki 20:21, 05 Septiembre 2006

[edit] Re:Ayuda

Bueno, tanto como uno de los "líderes" de wikipedia no creo, pero la verdad no puedo opinar sin ver cual fue el artículo que produjo todo tu enojo, he buscado y no encuentro nada sobre Mia Rauz en wikipedia en inglés, es que ya fue borrado? Como ves cada artículo tiene una sección de discusión donde se puede argumentar todo lo que quieras a favor de un artículo y el propósito de todos es mejorar los artículos colaborando. Saludos y espero me mandes el enlace de la página del artículo si existe todavía. Radioheadhst 21:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El Síndrome

Vi que estabas editando en el artículo en español referente a la sustancia dietilenglicol, para que tengas idea desde hace unos días creé el artículo en español es:Síndrome de parálisis e insuficiencia renal aguda, pero como veo que eres médico me podrías ayudar a mejorar el tema, dado que mi única fuente son los periódicos. Un saludo. --Taichi 05:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Panama Canal images

Hi,

Your images at Panama Canal expansion proposal will need to be listed for deletion. Unfortunately the permission you got from the webmaster just says it's OK for Wikipedia to use the images with attribution. This is very different from the acceptable usage, "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that PanCanal.com is indicated as the source."

Basically these images need to be marked with the "permission" tag which unfortunately means they'll be deleted, as such images are not allowed on Wikipedia.

If you could ask the PanCanal.com webmaster to release the images in an unrestricted fashion - that is, *anyone*, not just Wikipedia, is allowed to use the images, as long as attribution is given - then we'd be in the clear.

Thanks - Tempshill 19:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree it'd be a shame to delete the images; that's why I'm asking you to get a more clear letter of permission, so they can be kept. The webmaster's statement you cited is vague: "we have no problem that you use the information from our Web site, as long as you indicate it as the source." Are you claiming that by "you", the webmaster meant to say "the entire world"? Or were you representing yourself as a Wikipedia editor in the conversation? I have assumed the latter is more probable. Thanks - Tempshill 19:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that'd be another good angle - possibly you or another editor could simply look up the law to see if works of the Panamanian government belong to the public domain, as is true in the US; and also of course someone would have to verify whether those maps and graphs are "works of the Panamanian government". (They might be works of a separate corporation the government set up, or something, and exempt from such a law.) Tempshill 20:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Contribution Recognition

The Original Barnstar
For overall diligence and dedication to wikipedia, especially in your activity in creating new articles, I'd like to award you a barnstar. Here's to the first of many; keep up the good work. ~Masquatto 06:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Coffee as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Coffee was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

– ClockworkSoul 04:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Islam as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Islam was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Dev920 13:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Rosetta Stone as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rosetta Stone was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 16:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Death as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Death was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Jupiter as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Jupiter was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 14:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Peloponnesian War as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Peloponnesian War was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 12:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Wall Street Crash of 1929 as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Wall Street Crash of 1929 was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Coffins1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coffins1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Justine pasek.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Justine pasek.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PageantUpdater User Talk Review me! 23:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Life9enero.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Life9enero.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Planexpansion.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Planexpansion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hn2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hn2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:20040827_1.jpg

I have tagged Image:20040827_1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:1964e2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1964e2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:9deenerofence.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:9deenerofence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:1964d1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1964d1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Flagpres.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flagpres.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stefaniederoux earth2006.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefaniederoux earth2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1964p.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1964p.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Panamacity_night.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Panamacity_night.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  But|seriously|folks  06:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Panameños

Hola mi nombre es Fernando y soy panameño, sabes es bueno encontrar otro panameños, asi podemos trabajar en las paginas de panama. Y necesito bukin ayuda. Yo trato d ser serio y siempre poner informacion veraz y bien citada. Deberiamo crear una red de panameños asi nos apoyamos con los articulos. Thanks Nando Cdl (talk) 04:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Chacarron.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chacarron.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)