User talk:Radical man 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add articles in Spanish into the English wikipedia; their proper place is in the Spanish wikipedia (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portada). And here's the welcome I received when I joined Wikipedia. It will explain how to edit pages, etc., which would be good for you to read as your pages do not follow Wikipedia's format:

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello Radical man 7, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some good places to get you started:

float
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please visit the help desk. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

— Yupik 09:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Analisis de imagenes

Your recent edit to Analisis de imagenes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] flaw in anti-vandalism bot

Copied from the note you left on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

I've already deleted twice an article I wrote. The bot has already undeleted it once. It's obvious that the bot can't tell when an author deletes his own work. The article is Analisis de imagenes=Imagery analysis. I made the mistake of writing the article in the wrong version of wikipedia, and have already started the process of translating and introducing the article into the spanish edition.Radical man 7 20:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  • That's not a flaw. It's quite deliberate. You did not delete the article, you just blanked it, which leaves an empty shell. We do not want empty, blank articles left lying around. The proper method for what you want to do is add a tag at the top of the article that says {{db-author}}. This is the code for "Author requests deletion" so an admin can actually delete the article properly. Fan-1967 20:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • After the note you left, an editor has placed that tag on Analisis de imagenes for you, and it's been deleted. -- Fan-1967 21:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MI Article

I've moved your comments to the talk page. Feel free to edit the article although please bear in mind the constraints of [[ verifiability and reliability.ALR 22:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tactical Intelligence

Please review the links in the welcome message above for guides to layout and formatting. In particular, do not start any lines with a space, as it leads to what you see in this article with the boxed, gray background, and no line-wrapping.

Also, Discussion and Talk page posts should always be signed. Articles should never be signed. All articles are considered to be the common product of the community, with no authorship or ownership. -- Fan-1967 18:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Imagery Analysis

Welcome to Wikipedia! I can see that you have a lot of knowledge and enthusiasm about topics related to the military and military intelligence. However, Wikipedia is not the place for original research, like the unsourced essay you posted to Imagery Analysis. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so the content needs to be verifiable. Furthermore, Wikipedia attempts to maintain a standard level of formatting, which is covered in the Manual of Style. I'm going to take a stab at reformatting the article to get rid of those indentation boxes, but a serious look needs to be made as to the content of the article, on finding and incorporating good sources, and whether it should be merged and incorporated into an article like Image analysis. -sthomson06 (Talk) 15:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Military staff article

Looking at the article you did, it appears to contain info which duplicated parts of the General Staff existing article. Was there anything new there? Why do you feel that the redirect was a mistake?

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert 20:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Imagery interest and other matters

I found your userpage after doing considerable edits to the Armageddon Wikipedia reference page. Right now, I'm looking over your User page and note the following:

My background includes formal training as an imagery analyst(MOS96D), I am a musician, singer, student of the bible, lover of all things historical and technological. My contributions include: Imagery analysis Tactical Intelligence Analisis de Imagenes, Artillery spotting, and Archeological imagery.

Based on this, I have a few questions: 1) When you examine digital images, what software package(s) do you use to verify authenticity? 2) You indicate that you're a student of the Bible. I'm wondering if, by some chance, you have any experience with the 'Bible Code' software that Michael Drosnin talks about in two of his books? (see http://www.research-systems.com/codes/codefind.html?ad=biblecode) I'm considering buying the package itself (see "Codefinder") but I do take the subject of eschatology very seriously so, this would just be a "side-journey" for me. Thanks for your feedback.---- MurderWatcher1 (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Hi, my participation in the Imagery field was during the late cold war period, I would be both trained and exposed to just film at the time. Most of the analytical techniques are found in the Imagery Analysis article. As far as how I study the bible, its all a matter of repeated readings over the last thirty years, twice before I joined the local church, three more times within the first year as a member, and at least one reading per year, both english and spanish. The reason I mentioned that is because it was the mechanism that made it possible to; 1. remember key verses. 2. begin to make associations. 3. begin to follow concepts from their introduction to their end later in scripture. 4. begin to understand prophecy as a series of related concepts that start out in Genesis and are fully manifested in Revelations. 5. Ultimately it lead me to understand the use of precedent as it applies to prophecy and scripture in general. 6. interacting with forums has led me to establish the need to create and follow definitions, and methodologies that result in viable chronologies. Looking at the date from your note, I guess you might already have the software, i hope it works for you. If you have any questions, feel free...