Talk:Radu Sîrbu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
WikiProject Romania This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Romania, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Romania-related topics. Please visit the the Wikipedia:WikiProject Romania if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Radu Sîrbu:

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

[edit] Radu Sârbu, Sîrbu or Sǐrbu

I think that "Sârbu" is new spelling form for ROMANIAN language. "Sîrbu" is MOLDOVAN, and OLD Romanian. "Sǐrbu" (an "i" with a breve) is incorrect. Peccafly 11:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Well what you call "OLD Romanian" is actually newer than the so called "New Romanian". The "OLD romanian" was a way for the Soviets and the communist to break down the language and to bring conformaty to the population. --Nat.tang 23:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction Peccafly 10:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Added NPOV tag

Article needs a rewrite so it reads less like a fanpost.--Isotope23 20:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I tried my best to fix it up. --Flyinghippo 22:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

much better tone... it actually looks like an encyclopedia article now... nice work.--Isotope23 12:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)