Talk:Radiator Springs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Arizona, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Arizona.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Radiator Springs article.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] Discuss: Merge with Cars (film)

Any relation/similitude to Colorado Springs?

[edit] Discus: Merge Casa Della Tires into this.

I think it's taking it too far to make articles for all the individual business of the town. CDT should be merged into this article. RMS Oceanic 12:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] California vs. Arizona

I thought in the movie it said Radiator Springs was in Arizona, which is what the article says. But the article is categorized as "Fictional towns and cities in California" and is part of Wikiproject California. I'm going to move it to the US category.Squad51 21:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually, Radiator Springs is in New Mexico. A•N•N•A hi! 22:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

Some users have been merging the article into the Cars (film) article, which was discussed earlier with a result of Do Not Merge. When they merge the article, it keeps on coming back. I believe that the article should not be merged. A•N•N•A hi! 14:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

If you recall, we had another discussion on the main article regarding this, the toy line, and a couple of others, thus overtaking this older one. It doesn't need to come back. TTN 14:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
See the above discussion, with a result of Do Not Merge. A•N•N•A hi! 14:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Consensus can change, so when a new discussion happens, it changes. We aren't forced to stick with older discussions if new ones happen. TTN 14:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
And so far, the only person who has said anything about merging it is you, TNN. Every other comment states to keep it separate. Yeah, I know, I'm not an account holder, so you probably will ignore me. Oh, well. 68.52.88.131 05:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)