Talk:Rab concentration camp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War II task force

Archives
2007

[edit] Figures

In the italian wp, there is a figure of the number of prisoners in different periods. Unfortunately, sources are missing. Can anybody check it out:

Period	Men	Women	Children	Total
July 27-July 31, 1942	1061	111	53	1225
August 1-August 15, 1942	3992	0	1029	5021
August 16-August 31, 1942	5333	1076	1209	7618
September 1-September 15, 1942	6787	1563	1296	9646
September 16-September 30, 1942	7327	1804	1392	10 523
October 1-October 15, 1942	7387	1854	1392	10 633
October 16-October 31, 1942	7206	1991	1422	10 619
November 1-November 15, 1942	7207	2062	1463	10 732
November 16-November 27, 1942	6647	1560	926	9133
Fonte:,Davide Rodogno Il nuovo ordine mediterraneo, ed. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 2003

I think it would be appropriate to include it, but as I've said, sources are missing. Viator slovenicus (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm a total idiot: of course there is a source, I just didn't noticed it. I haven't read the book quoted, but Davide Rodogno is a very good historian and I tend to believe the figures are exact. What do you think of including the table in the article? Viator slovenicus (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Viator, it seems at face falue to be well sourced material that would be a welcome addition to the article. Pity they are only partial figures (up to Nov 1942) but partial is anyway an excellent start. Hopefully in time the remaining data will come to light. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Anon's edit

I am curious about the reason for this revert?[1] --El on ka 05:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

The anon is obviously trying to "POV-ize" the article. No sources were added, just a typical IP read-thru edit. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 08:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

There may have been some POV language, but there were also several good changes, and the addition of a photo, all of which was reverted wholesale. This could be seen as a violation of WP:OWN. We want anons and other editors to be able to come in and make good faith changes. In the future, instead of just reverting an edit, it would be better to change it. Keep the good parts, tweak the bad parts. Reversions should only be for really blatant situations such as vandalism. --El on ka 13:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)