Talk:R32 (New York City Subway car)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City Public Transportation.
Low Importance: low within New York City Public Transportation WikiProject.

See discussion at: Category talk:New York City Subway passenger equipment

[edit] Merge proposal

I have proposed merging the R32A article with this one, as there is virtually no difference. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. There is no reason to have a separate article named 'R32A' when they are now the same thing. Just mention in the r32 article that there used tobe a difference between car models and that it is now gone.Krisricky627 (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Makes a lot of sense to me too. Perhaps R40/R40A too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.162.226 (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Not really R40 and R40A, there actually is a difference between them as of right now.Krisricky627 (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] R32A no longer exists.

I just clicked on the R32A link and was redirected right back to the R32 page. Since the article no longer exists, it's pretty pointless to keep the merger proposal on the page. I'm not going to delete it just yet to spare myself from some scolding on my talk page. I just wanted to see your opinion on the issue before (and if) I do anything. Thanks! -Fan Railer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Railer (talkcontribs) 22:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree Fan Railer, go ahead. Acps110 (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Go ahead. It's logical especially since the train isn't classified as R32A anymore. However someone should remove the R32A link at the bottom of the page, if that's possible.Krisricky627 (talk) 00:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I got rid of it (the nonexisting link). -Fan Railer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Railer (talkcontribs) 21:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)