Talk:R. v. Prosper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
[edit] accuracy?
The article says "The court unanimously held that the Charter does impose an obligation to ensure duty counsel is available upon arrest." That's wrong, isn't it? I don't have time to read the whole case, but the headnote seems to say that the Court unanimously held that the Charter does not impose a substantive legal obligation on the government to provide duty counsel. --Mathew5000 22:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
