Talk:R. James Woolsey, Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Oklahoma Portal This article is part of WikiProject Oklahoma, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Oklahoma.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is of low-importance within WikiProject Oklahoma.
	This article is supported by Taskforce Tulsa.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Contents 1 Richard Woolsey 2 Contradictory 3 Re: Deletion of "Criticism" section 4 External links

[edit] Richard Woolsey

Does anyone know if Richard Woolsey from stargate based on this guy? Someone brought it up on his discussion so I thought Id bring it up here so if it was it could be mentioned in this article if he was.Irate velociraptor 04:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, they certainly look alike. 1ne 05:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Contradictory

This article states that Woolsey is a conservative Democrat, then goes on in the categories section to state that he's a neoconservative. Since he's a member of the Project for a New American Century, I really don't know either way what his political leanings are. 1ne 02:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

It says he's been known primarily as a conservative democrat, not that he is one. --Golbez 03:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Being traditionally Democratic on social and economic issues but being hawkish on foreign policy doesn't make you a neocon...if that's what we use to decide if someone's a neocon or not, then Bill Clinton is one. 1ne 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Right, hm, true. Maybe his being in the Neocon cat is incorrect. --Golbez 03:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Since the "Neocon" category has been removed, I guess the article is not self-contradictory anymore?Biophys 21:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Deletion of "Criticism" section

Unless we're going to start listing generic "criticism" of every individual on Wikipedia, there's no reason Mr. Woolsey deserves special attention.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.208.39.250 (talk • contribs)

The criticism is well-sourced and notable. Do not remove it again. — goethean ॐ 21:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Please don't remove external links because you don't like them. Feel free to add more and present a range of views.JQ 07:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)