User talk:Rōnin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hoho ^^ Havok (T/C) 18:21, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

RE: BPD edits:

Huge objection. ICD-9 criteria and DSM-IV-TR are not equivalent. They should not be presented as such. It confuses the diagnostic paradigm with the descriptive...apples and oranges. In addition, "nonBPD" is a reactive character style, not a personality disorder. Merging the nonBPD article with the BPD article would be like merging an article on co-dependence with one on alcoholism. Related, but not integrated in a scientificially meaningful manner. Mjformica 01:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 記事作成の依頼 Kiji Sakusei no Irai

はじめまして、Hattoです。俺は日本在住の日本人なのですが、ノルウェー語が解らないのでRōninさんにお願いがあります。Rōninさんがノルウェー語を母語とし、英語を流暢に話せて、日本語もある程度理解出来るということでぜひともノルウェー語（もちろんbokmålで）で記事の新規作成をお願いしたいのですがよろしいですか？英語も日本語も得意な人を探しており、英語も重要ですが、日本の芸能人の記事を作って欲しいので、なるべく英語よりも日本語の能力が高い人を優先していたのですが、見つからなかったのでせめてある程度でも日本語を理解している人を探した末にRōninさんに執筆の依頼をすることにしました。誰の記事を作って欲しいかは後で述べますので、お返事下さい。--Hatto 03:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Begyn igjen!

Start å rediger mann! Havok (T/C/c) 12:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The... vote

Hei David, would you mind taking a look at the vote for the way we represent articles about consoles and handheld systems? Thank you. Havok (T/C/c) 23:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Liancourt Rocks edit

Someone reverted your NPOV edit on the opening of the Liancourt Rocks/Dokdo/Takeshima page. I didn't revert it back since I thought you might like to be the one to provide the rationale, or perhaps you will accept his reasoning. Personally, I think it's a good attempt regardless of where the article winds up. LactoseTIT 01:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake! I have hope that it turns out for the best in the end myself. It seems a lot of people have their eyes on that page now, perhaps because of the change. LactoseTIT 03:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chongryon / Zainichi Koreans

You're spot on - I added the edit to the wrong article. I've moved the contents Phonemonkey 11:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments on Notability and fangames

Hi,

I've noticed you commented on several fangames, stating that notability is subjective.

Notability is not subjective on Wikipedia (User:Uncle G/On notability provides a very clear picture of what notability is). The main notability criteria is multiple non-trivial mentions in third-party published works. Notability itself stems from Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and verifiability. Fangames, like other self-published material, will often not meet this type of criteria because they don't have multiple non-trivial mentions in third party published works (self-published works, such as fan webpages and webzines, are often dubious in this regard - see the reliable sources criterion). But the fact is, they often tend to have a fan base that is connected to the web, and so random fans (who are not familiar with policy) will create an article on Wikipedia, believing that they're adding useful information. But unfortunately, because the material is unsourced, it is original research on the part of the fans themselves. Original research is not the point of an Encyclopedia, which is a tertiary source.

I hope this clarifies things. ColourBurst 23:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dokdo naming dispute

Hey, another Dokdo naming dispute has arisen, & RM has taken place. Please check archive for previous discussions & pariticipate in the vote. Thanks. I'm also going to note all others who participated in the previous poll. (Wikimachine 18:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC))