User talk:Quoth nevermore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome, Quoth nevermore, and thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately, all featured articles must go through the review at WP:FA. However, you may want to get more tips and tricks for your userpage at WP:USERPAGE and WP:UBX. Again, thank you, and welcome to Wikipedia! Cool Bluetalk to me 17:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Maria Lauterbach
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Maria Lauterbach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Maria Lauterbach
An editor has nominated Maria Lauterbach, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Lauterbach and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Research
Is use of a disruptive sockpuppet such an eggregious act that is incompatible with adminship?
Are there anyone you know that has such a disruptive sockpuppet?
The question to both questions must be yes before any action is contemplated. I haven't researched the situation (other than reading it on ANI) nor have I thought about any course of action. Therefore, the admin in question should not worry or think this message is against him. It is more theoretical in nature. Congolese fufu (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your user page
Hello, I notice you are using your user page for hosting a copy-and-pasted mirror of a mainspace article. This is not what user pages are for, especially not with content that is politically controversial and antagonising (see WP:USER). Plus, it's a problem in copyright (GFDL) terms. Could you please remove that article from there? If you want the copy for use as a temporary sandbox for developing it, then I suggest you move it to a subpage of yours, like User:Quoth nevermore/List of massacres (but since you haven't worked on the page so far, I'm not sure that's what you have in mind.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Template:DEPTH
Hi Quoth nevermore. Can you assist in categorizing {{DEPTH}}? It appears unused, so perhaps you can tag it with {{Db-g7}} for a speedy deletion by author request. – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 10:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:DEPTH
Template:DEPTH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 10:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cite web
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cite web, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cite web. RkORToN 03:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
