Quotient ring
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics a quotient ring, also known as factor ring or residue class ring, is a construction in ring theory, quite similar to the factor groups of group theory and the quotient spaces of linear algebra. One starts with a ring R and a two-sided ideal I in R, and constructs a new ring, the quotient ring R/I, essentially by requiring that all elements of I be zero. Intuitively, the quotient ring R/I is a "simplified version" of R where the elements of I are "ignored".
Quotient rings are distinct from the so-called 'quotient field', or field of fractions, of an integral domain as well as from the more general 'rings of quotients' obtained by localization.
Contents |
[edit] Formal quotient ring construction
Given a ring R and a two-sided ideal I in R, we may define an equivalence relation ~ on R as follows:
- a ~ b if and only if b − a is in I.
Using the ideal properties, it is not difficult to check that ~ is a congruence relation. In case a ~ b, we say that a and b are congruent modulo I. The equivalence class of the element a in R is given by
- [a] = a + I := { a + r : r in I }.
This equivalence class is also sometimes written as a mod I and called the "residue class of a modulo I".
The set of all such equivalence classes is denoted by R/I; it becomes a ring, the factor ring or quotient ring of R modulo I, if one defines
- (a + I) + (b + I) = (a + b) + I;
- (a + I)(b + I) = (ab) + I.
(Here one has to check that these definitions are well-defined. Compare coset and quotient group.) The zero-element of R/I is (0 + I) = I, and the multiplicative identity is (1 + I).
The map p from R to R/I defined by p(a) = a + I is a surjective ring homomorphism, sometimes called the natural quotient map or the canonical homomorphism.
[edit] Examples
The most extreme examples of quotient rings are provided by modding out the most extreme ideals, {0} and R itself. R/{0} is naturally isomorphic to R, and R/R is the trivial ring {0}. This fits with the general rule of thumb that the smaller the ideal I, the larger the quotient ring R/I. If I is a proper ideal of R, i.e. I ≠ R, then R/I won't be the trivial ring.
Consider the ring of integers Z and the ideal of even numbers, denoted by 2Z. Then the quotient ring Z/2Z has only two elements, one for the even numbers and one for the odd numbers. It is naturally isomorphic to the finite field with two elements, F2. Intuitively: if you think of all the even numbers as 0, then every integer is either 0 (if it is even) or 1 (if it is odd and therefore differs from an even number by 1). Modular arithmetic is essentially arithmetic in the quotient ring Z/nZ (which has n elements).
Now consider the ring R[X] of polynomials in the variable X with real coefficients, and the ideal I = (X2 + 1) consisting of all multiples of the polynomial X2 + 1. The quotient ring R[X]/(X2 + 1) is naturally isomorphic to the field of complex numbers C, with the class [X] playing the role of the imaginary unit i. The reason: we "forced" X2 + 1 = 0, i.e. X2 = -1, which is the defining property of i.
Generalizing the previous example, quotient rings are often used to construct field extensions. Suppose K is some field and f is an irreducible polynomial in K[X]. Then L = K[X]/(f) is a field which contains K as well as an element x = X + (f) whose minimal polynomial over K is f.
One important instance of the previous example is the construction of the finite fields. Consider for instance the field F3 = Z/3Z with three elements. The polynomial f(X) = X2 + 1 is irreducible over F3 (since it has no root), and we can construct the quotient ring F3[X]/(f). This is a field with 32=9 elements, denoted by F9. The other finite fields can be constructed in a similar fashion.
The coordinate rings of algebraic varieties are important examples of quotient rings in algebraic geometry. As a simple case, consider the real variety V = {(x,y) | x2 = y3 } as a subset of the real plane R2. The ring of real-valued polynomial functions defined on V can be identified with the quotient ring R[X,Y]/(X2 - Y3), and this is the coordinate ring of V. The variety V is now investigated by studying its coordinate ring.
Suppose M is a C∞ -manifold, and p is a point of M. Consider the ring R=C∞(M) of all C∞-functions defined on M and let I be the ideal in R consisting of those functions f which are identically zero in some neighborhood U of p (where U may depend on f). Then the quotient ring R/I is the ring of germs of C∞-functions on M at p.
Consider the ring F of finite elements of a hyperreal field *R. It consists of all hyperreal numbers differing from a standard real by an infinitesimal amount, or equivalently: of all hyperreal numbers x for which a standard integer n with -n < x < n exists. The set I of all infinitesimal numbers in *R, together with 0, is an ideal in F, and the quotient ring F/I is isomorphic to the real numbers. The isomorphism is induced by associating to every element x of F the standard part of x, i.e. the unique real number that differs from x by an infinitesimal.
[edit] Alternative complex planes
The quotients R[X]/(x) , R[X]/(x+1), and R[X]/(x-1) are all isomorphic to R and gain little interest at first. But note that R[X]/(X2) is called the dual number plane in geometric algebra. It consists only of linear binomials as “remainders” after reducing an element of R[X] by X2. This alternative complex plane arises frequently enough to accent its existence.
Furthermore, the ring quotient R[X]/(X2 −1) does split into R[X]/(X+1) and R[X]/(X−1), so this split-complex number ring is often viewed as the direct sum R R. Nevertheless, a complex number structure based on a hyperbola is brought in. The planar linear algebra of squeeze mapping , a.k.a. hyperbolic rotation, fits naturally. The parallel with ordinary complex number representation of circular rotation is a part of split-complex number assignments and arithmetic.
[edit] Quaternions and alternatives
Hamilton’s quaternions of 1843 can be cast as R[X,Y]/(X2 + 1, Y2 + 1, XY + YX). If Y2 − 1 is substituted for Y2 + 1, then one obtains the ring of split-quaternions. Substituting minus for plus in both the quadratic binomials also results in split-quaternions: The anti-commutative property YX = −XY implies that XY has for its square
- (XY)(XY) = X(YX)X = − X(XY)Y = − XXYY = − 1.
The three types of biquaternions can also be written as quotients by conscripting the three-indeterminate ring R[X,Y,Z] and constructing appropriate ideals.
[edit] Properties
Clearly, if R is a commutative ring, then so is R/I; the converse however is not true in general.
The natural quotient map p has I as its kernel; since the kernel of every ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal, we can state that two-sided ideals are precisely the kernels of ring homomorphisms.
The intimate relationship between ring homomorphisms, kernels and quotient rings can be summarized as follows: the ring homomorphisms defined on R/I are essentially the same as the ring homomorphisms defined on R that vanish (i.e. are zero) on I. More precisely: given a two-sided ideal I in R and a ring homomorphism f : R → S whose kernel contains I, then there exists precisely one ring homomorphism g : R/I → S with gp = f (where p is the natural quotient map). The map g here is given by the well-defined rule g([a]) = f(a) for all a in R. Indeed, this universal property can be used to define quotient rings and their natural quotient maps.
As a consequence of the above, one obtains the fundamental statement: every ring homomorphism f : R → S induces a ring isomorphism between the quotient ring R/ker(f) and the image im(f). (See also: fundamental theorem on homomorphisms.)
The ideals of R and R/I are closely related: the natural quotient map provides a bijection between the two-sided ideals of R that contain I and the two-sided ideals of R/I (the same is true for left and for right ideals). This relationship between two-sided ideal extends to a relationship between the corresponding quotient rings: if M is a two-sided ideal in R that contains I, and we write M/I for the corresponding ideal in R/I (i.e. M/I = p(M)), the quotient rings R/M and (R/I)/(M/I) are naturally isomorphic via the (well-defined!) mapping a + M |-> (a+I) + M/I.
In commutative algebra and algebraic geometry, the following statement is often used: If R ≠ {0} is a commutative ring and I is a maximal ideal, then the quotient ring R/I is a field; if I is only a prime ideal, then R/I is only an integral domain. A number of similar statements relate properties of the ideal I to properties of the quotient ring R/I.
The Chinese remainder theorem states that, if the ideal I is the intersection (or equivalently, the product) of pairwise coprime ideals I1,...,Ik, then the quotient ring R/I is isomorphic to the product of the quotient rings R/Ip , p=1,...,k.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Ideals and factor rings from John Beachy's Abstract Algebra Online
- Quotient ring on PlanetMath