From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is part of WikiProject Theoretical Linguistics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to theoretical linguistics and theories of language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Iceland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project’s quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Clarification request
- Swedish-language verbs forced subjects to agree in person around the 15th century, the advent of modern Swedish. Agreement in number remained in written Swedish as late as the 20th century, though, even though all subject-verb agreement had disappeared in speech by the 17th century.
I'm a little confused about what this means. Does "agreement in number" mean, for example, that the word for "He" would be different in "He ate an orange" and "He ate some oranges"? What about "agreement in person"? Different between "He likes me" and "He likes her"? Even though English makes no distinction I feel this section would benefit greatly from some English-language examples to illustrate how it would work if it did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.169.18 (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)