Talk:Quintus Caecilius Iucundus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability

As the Cambridge Latin Course article is quite short, I'd suggest this article be merged with it. Also, it's hard to imagine someone looking up Quintus Caecilius Iucundus in an encyclopedia, which after all, what I understand Wikipedia to be. --Everett 07:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

As the CLC tends to blur the lines between historical Romans and fictional Romans, I can imagine people looking for Quintus in Wikipedia. Additionally, as a major character, I consider him notable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Real or not real?

The article on Lucius Caecilius Iucundus explicitly states that Quintus and Sextus both existed in real life, as well as within the scope of the Cambridge Latin Course. One of these articles must be wrong..? Leushenko 18:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to put {{Contradict-other}} on this article and on Caecilius someone should know.--71.170.106.104 21:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Resolved, see Caecilius' talk page and online source added to article. - Fayenatic (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Huh? Quintus is real? According to my copy of the books, the back cover of Unit I explicitly states that Caecilius is real and that Quintus is entirely fictional. Huh? Angelica K (talk) 14:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Of course Quintus is real!! Ceacilius is real and he had a son Quintus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.28.179 (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Caecilius had two sons Quintus and Sextus, as documented in August Mau, Pompeii: Its Life and Art p.507. If you're checking it online, you'll have to enter the page number 507. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)