Talk:Quintuplets 2000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please rename this article and remove the "2000" at the end.
The episode is just called "Quintuplets".
See: SouthParkStudios —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.150.141.118 (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 |
Quintuplets 2000 is part of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park. If you wish to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Russian Joke
What are the two Russian guards talking/joking about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.239.67 (talk) 02:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Romanian official: Nid kelmin da bushka. Attendant: Nid kelmin da lushka velt Romanian official: Nid kelmin da bushka ayn zolt! [the men laugh, the attendant looks at his watch] Attendant: M-Mrs. Vladchick? [the men enter and find the open window and no one at all] Romanian official: Dash fam da bushka!
I can't see any RUSSAN word here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.57.56.23 (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
yeah me neither User:SPBLU
Why would the Romanian officials speak Russian anyway? But nevertheless, can anyone clarify wether they do speak an actual language, and maybe even translate their lines. -92.226.199.127 (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Three legs scene
I think the scene where the grandmother has three legs is clearly intended as a joke and is not really a goof. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fengin (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Trivia
How are the Dionne Quintuplets a "current" event? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.81.123.57 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC).
- They're not a current event but the Romanian quintuplets in the episode are depicted as performers. The Dionne quintuplets were taken away from their parents and put on public display by the Ontario government at "Quintland". Sound familiar? I don't think its an coincidence the plot and title mention Quintuplets, who happen to be performers. It looks like a well placed reference to this event even if it was in the 1930's. To not mention it in the article is to ignore the obvious. Skywayman 04:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I was initially puzzled why the thread starter implied this was posted as a current event. I had made the original post under trivia. That says nothing about a current event. Going through the edit history line by line later I see someone edited this as an example of a current event. Clearly it's not a current event. It's trivia about the title and group of Romanian quintuplets though so I'm restoring it as such with no implication it is a current event. Skywayman 05:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Goofs
"SOUVENIRS" isn't a word in French, so "LES SOUVENIRS" is just as improper as "LE SOUVENIRS". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.112.166.83 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
"Souvenir" is a word in French. However the use of the definite article ("le souvenir", "les souvenirs") is improper here; the correct form would be "SOUVENIRS". 169.229.54.104 22:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Florent
[edit] Goof
At the beginning of the episode Kenny, Cartman, Stan, Kevin McCormick and Kyle are all lined up but then it cuts to Sharon Marsh and returns to the boys Kevin is gone and Grandpa Marsh pulls up in his place. I believe this is an obvious goof.
[edit] Arias sung by Kenny
Wouldn't the list of songs Kenny practices/sings during the episode count for something? Alamandrax 16:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Quint1.jpg
Image:Quint1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Quint2.jpg
Image:Quint2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
