Talk:Quilchena Elementary School (Richmond)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Education in Canada
This article is part of the Education in Canada WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
British Columbia
This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
This article is part of WikiProject Vancouver, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area. To participate, edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.

[edit] Page move

Any objections to moving the page to Quilchena Elementary School (Richmond)? --Usgnus 22:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment as of March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: Very little information, no citations, not a great picture. Probably a candidate for deletion. Adam McCormick 05:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)