Talk:Queen of the Sea train disaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject. |
When I initially created this article I provided Samudradevi as the local name of the train, with no attribution as to what language it is. Someone has since ascribed this as being the Tamil name, but given the part of the island the train was running in I would have thought it was more likely to be in Sinhalese. Can someone provide definite information either way? -- Arwel 03:50, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I am Sri Lankan (Sinhalese). Samudradevi is a Sinhalese word. It may mean the same thing in Tamil as well - I don't know Tamil.
It is somewhat mysterious that so many people died on this train. The Head Guard (one of the few survivors) has reported that the train was halted for 20 minutes after the first wave struck. The third wave (20 minutes after the first) was the massive one which caused the deaths). The driver stayed in his compartment, apparently waiting for orders, but he had no mobile phone. It is said that there was a lagoon on the land side of the train, so that an exit in that direction wouldn't have been easy. Whatever the reasons, there appears to have been a feeling among the passengers that they would be safe if they stayed on the train.
They were tragically wrong. When the tsunami struck it said to have been 20 feet high, not as high as the 30-foot wave which hit the South-east coast of the island and, also, the train was 200 metres inland. It is likely that if passengers had got off the train and taken shelter on the landward side of it would have had a better chance of survival. The compartments filled with water instantaneously and most drowned inside. Even swimmers had little chance within a closed space.
Sena Fernando http://www.bestlanka.com
[edit] Double counting
Perhaps, to avoid misleading the statistics, this accident should be mentioned as a train accident, but should be counted as a tsunami accident.
Tabletop 04:36, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] I don't understand this
Since the disaster some local people have claimed that their relatives would not have died if the train hadn't been there because they would have headed to higher ground instead and described the train as a "curse" on the town.
"Instead" of what? I don't understand what this sentence is getting at. Are the local people claiming the train passengers would not have died if they weren't on the train? --P3d0 (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
