Talk:Queen of the Demonweb Pits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons, which collaborates on Dungeons & Dragons-related articles. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is part of The World of Greyhawk Wikiproject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the World of Greyhawk campaign setting for the Dungeons & Dragons roleplaying game on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Criticism

The whole motivation for the g1-g3 series, that being why the giants are raiding and what they are after, is completely ignored in the Q1 module. There never is any answer to what the giants were after, why lolth chose the giants, how she went about it, what was in it for the giants, what happened to those they conqered, etc. If taken out of context, it's a great module, but in the context of the series, it is meaningless. Even completing the module, there is no coverage of the effect destroying lolth has on the lands the giants sought to conquer. no epilogue with the nobles who sent your party on the quest. On its own, I love the module, but as part of the g/d series, it's incomplete. Exactly why lolth would even give the party means to come to her world is beyond me. For a ruler of a plane, she seems totally unaware of the party unless she actually has visual contact with them...she requires peepholes to watch the party in her own plane and her own ship? That makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.214.140 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 21 May 2007

Agreed - why don't you have a stab at incorporating this criticism into the text of the article?--Calabraxthis 16:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Because it doesn't come from a verifiable source? Cheers --Pak21 (talk) 16:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)