Talk:Queen's College, Edgbaston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Anglicanism
Queen's College, Edgbaston is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


This article is within the scope of the West Midlands WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the West Midlands. In so doing it works and collaborates with the two related projects UK Geography WikiProject and UK Subdivisions WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.

??? This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale.
??? This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Photo requesred

<<reqphotoin|Birmingham>> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward (talkcontribs) 21:31, 27 June 2006

Photo provided. Oosoom Talk to me 12:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] First altar for westward facing celebration?

this claim seem highly unlikely since westaward celebration had been the norm since the reformation, it sorely needs a reference. David Underdown 08:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Reference is footnote on page 252 of already quoted reference: Pevsner Architectural Guides - Birmingham, Andy Foster, 2005, ISBN 0-300-10731-5. Oosoom Talk to me 08:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough - I've now converted that to an inline referecne to make it clearer wehre it comes from - still find it hard to elieve, despite the provenance of the reference. David Underdown 13:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)