Talk:Queen's-McGill rivalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queen's-McGill rivalry article.

Article policies
This article is part of WikiProject Rowing, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.


[edit] 2002 Lorne Gales Winner

There is a discrepancy between the McGill rowing site and the Queen's rowing site as to which team won Lorne Gales in 2002. This photo of the actual trophy shows that it was in fact Queen's.

[edit] Big 3?

I always thought the big 3 where UofT, McGill and UBC... since when was Queens anywhere near the big 3? Also, should some world ranking be thrown in, like Times Higher (McGill: 21, Queens: 176), or would such things bias the article? --DFRussia 03:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

  • I totally agree with you. McGill UofT and UBC are considered big three. Queen's isnt even close.Gk89 (talk) 19:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Trojan horse

I just wanted to say that I included the paragraph on the Trojan horse. I saw it with my own eyes today. I will add some press references during in case they come out during the next days.

Ericbodden (talk) 01:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)