Talk:Quasi-quotation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] Two things
One, Lisp makes use of quasiquotation, and its influenced other languages: the computer science link should be covered. Alan Bawden's paper Quasiquotation in Lisp (PS) is a good resource for this.
Two, George Boolos has a nice, short article in his "Logic, Logic and Logic" on a problem with quasiquotation that we would benefit from discussing. Can't remember the title. --- Charles Stewart(talk) 06:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it would definitely be good to discuss quasiquotation in Lisp. I think the Boolos article you have in mind is "Quotational Ambiguity." However, it is not so much about quasi-quotation as about a more obscure difficulty (which he calls "Ernst's paradox" after the student who brought it to his attention) that can be encountered when attempting to use quotation in a strictly correct way. Ernst's paradox might be worth of its own article. I'll put it on my tentative to-do list. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 20:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] accessibility
I reckon this page is pretty unaccessible for someone who isn't familiar with the subject (Edmund1989 18:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC))
- I cleared it up a little bit, but I probably need to come back to it. The order of explanation is a little weird. We should be saying how it does work before saying how it doesn't. KSchutte 06:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
