Talk:Quality of models
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles about the idea of systems. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within Systems. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
I've added the context tag to this article again. It was removed by User:80.203.114.25 and replaced with the text "For evaluating the quality of models, the semiotic quality framework (SEQUAL), developed by John Krogstie, is introduced." I'm still not sure what the article is supposed to be about, although it appears to relate somehow to semiotics. What sort of models are we talking about exactly?
Additionally, I'm adding the inappropriate tone tag, as the article consists almost entirely of point-form notes. --Eloil 00:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
It concerns the modeling of information systems and Business processes. The sequal framework should have it's own page, though. No point in having it under the "quality of models" umbrella when the whole article concerns the framework. Also, other people have written about quality of models, e.g. Schneiderman --Fred 30 November 2007
