Talk:Quaker Council for European Affairs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), an attempt to better organise and unify articles relating to the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of low-importance within Quakerism.

	This article is part of WikiProject European Union, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject Human rights, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the Project page, where you can join the Project and contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Notability

If evidence of notability is not provided, then I am nominating this article for deletion. I am not saying that it isn't notable; just that this article doesn't give any proof as to that notability. J Milburn 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you explain what you mean by 'proof'? --Ahc 05:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I have since become rather convinced that this group is notable, and this article is now better sourced. However, what I meant at the time was mention of two independent, reliable, verifiable, non-trivial references to this group, as is explained here. J Milburn 18:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I see what happened, between when you posted and I asked, the verifiable references were provided, hence my confusion about your concern. It had already been fixed when I got here. --Ahc 05:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)