Talk:Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 29, 2007.
September 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article...


Good addition, a few links, may help reduce the load on the existing sources, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18170087 http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/04/18/china.steel/index.html http://search.uk.reuters.com/rsearch/rcomSearch.do?blob=Qinghe%20&WTmodLoc=ussrch-top-quote feel free to use or ignore them. --Drappel 16:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for those - I will definatly make use of them! Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Candidate Review

Hello,

I've completed the review of this article and am pleased to pass this article as I believe it meets the Good Article Criteria.

The article is written well and covers the topic thoroughly. References are used everywhere that is appropriate, and the image used has a fair use rationale. I am satisfied that this article is written from a Neutral Point of View. It contains an impressive amount of information on such an event. I believe the editors have done excellent work to bring the article up to this standard considering the incident was just five months ago.

Thanks for all the hard work on this article, and congratulations on its promotion to good article status. Pursey Talk | Contribs 10:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)