Talk:Qilibi Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	Qilibi Khan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Central Asian portions of Iran and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Self Translated Non-English Sources

It appears the user:nlu who created this article (and a number of other Göktürk ruler articles) also translated the content from Chinese sources. When I tried to categorize it as Category:Turkic rulers the same user removed my category entry and insited on his/her POV eventhough there is no concrete rule for building hierarchies of categories. Source material is dubious and this user is acting as if he/she owns the article.--Nostradamus1 (talk) 00:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not based on my POV; it's based on WP:CAT. You haven't shown any good reason to deviate with the guideline there. It's not that the Göktürks weren't Turkic (they clearly are); it's that Category:Göktürk rulers are already a subcategory of Category:Turkic rulers. I will repeat: WP:CAT indicates that absent extraordinary good cause, an article should not belong to a category and its subcategory. --Nlu (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)