Template:QF-source
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on June 15, 2008, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:
-
- had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to WP:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
[edit] Usage summary
{{subst:QF-source|closing comments = <!-- OPTIONAL --> }}— ~~~~
[edit] See also
- {{QF-unstable}} - for articles that are victims of edit wars, or discuss a future event
- {{QF-NPOV}} - for articles that lack neutrality
- {{QF-tags}} - for articles that contain cleanup tags
[edit] Note
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you.