User talk:PurpleRain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archives
1 2

Contents

[edit] RE: Signatures

Thx for the adoption Purple Rain. I am only 13 and I don't know about HTML or CSS, so I wa wondering how to put it in orange and black (Amber Hawk after all). Thx again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aviation Ace (talkcontribs) 15:48, April 5, 2007

[edit] Thx

Guess what? I just took an HTML and CSS online tutorial! I'm not really that good but I have a basic idea. Thx for helping me the name. I sent in a request for a change of username too. Q: Can I use your "Leave a new message" thing as template for one of my own? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aviation Ace (talkcontribs) 10:00, April 6, 2007

[edit] new user

Hi I am interested in learning more about how I can help edit and create new articles. Please let me know if you are available to mentor... thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgallego (talkcontribs) 06:51, July 8, 2007

[edit] THANK YOU!!

Thanks for helping me out in the align thing. Fattyjwoods (talk) 04:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoptee

Hi, I'm an adoptee. I saw you on the adopter's page and was wondering if you would adopt me? I have already made one slip up and don't wish to make any more! I would actually like to be a spelling and grammatical editor. Thanks for considering me. Independent147 (talk) 22:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Adoption

Thanks for letting me know. I have decided to go with a user that offered to adopt me, Sarcasticidealist. Have a great day. Independent147 (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks for answering my question! Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 19:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please be more patient before deleting when a citation is requested.

In regards to your hasty deletes in the Shaw Communications article I request that you give a sufficient amount of time for contributors to added citations when requested. The very use of a citation required reference advises all readers that the material may be suspect. A hasty delete is often a sign of a personal bias on the part of the editor. You should be commended for your hard work on the Shaw Communication article, however it is not your article it is public domain and I feel you were too quick to remove my contributions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.68.225.145 (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out. The reason I deleted it, instead of waiting for a citation, was because the wording sounded biased to me. I thought that with or without a citation, the paragraph was unencyclopedic. I have edited your paragraph to give it a more neutral tone. Hopefully that will make us both happy. —PurpleRAIN 21:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
See Talk:Shaw Communications#"Compromised Network" paragraph for more on this.

See my comments on the Shaw Communications Discussion page on why I reinstated the paragraph in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.68.225.159 (talk) 17:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)