User talk:PureRED

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're doing a good job reverting vandalism. Thanks for your help and please keep it up! PeaceNT 07:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Clit wank

Hi there; while this article may well deserve deletion ,the reason that you have given is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. The accepted reasons are listed in WP:CSD. This article is probably best dealt with by using {{prod}}. I am aware of the potential for humour contained in this suggestion.--Anthony.bradbury 20:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Qualities

Dear PureRED,

It has come to my attention that you and I both have many of the same characteristics and qualities. I must wonder as to whether we have possibly spoken before? After all, having things in common is only a precursor to being familiar with someone. Atrophicwhisper

[edit] RFC Mike Jones

I've started a Request for Comment on Mike Jones (rapper). Since you added or reverted a edit pertaining to the subject matter of the RfC, you may be interested in contributing your opinion/statement at Talk:Mike_Jones_(rapper)#Request_for_Comment --Ted 22:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite tag on The Passion of the Christ

Could you start this discussion on Talk:The Passion of the Christ? It would be more helpful to make your ideas known, rather than tagging "drive-by" style[1]. / edgarde 05:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Passion of the Christ

Afraid not. All I'm saying is that the plot summary needs to be shortened, or rewritten. It's written in broken English at times, and is already far too long. I simply put up the tag so everyone knows it needs to be rewritten. If you feel it should be removed, feel free to take it down. --PureRED - Kyle Floyd 06:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you just say that? A copy & paste into Talk:The Passion of the Christ and you're good. No need to waste a good tagging. / edgarde 06:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Thank You!

Your welcome, that is what vandal fighters do: defending pages and userpages ^_^.--PrestonH(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!) 03:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Also not a problem, sir. Glad to help. —BazookaJoe 13:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, PureRED! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 16:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

If you have a problem with deletion tags, take a look at WP:CSD. Happy wikying.--Anthony.bradbury 17:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Huh?

I have no idea what you are talking about - please be more clear. I edited an article (the Evan Lysacek one) which has numerous errors in it. I have edited many Wikipedia articles with no problems before. For some reason, it is automatically reverted back each time, and you sent me a strange message saying I was "test editing" and to play somewhere else. You also said something about vandalism in an article - I did not put any vandalism in an article. I posted a message in the "editing" section using the <-- --> signs so that it would not post into the article, (something I have seen administrators do several times) asking the reverter to discuss the errors on the "discussion" page, where I was explaining why I had made the changes.

Is there a particular reason that the grammatical and factual errors in the Lysacek article have to stay in Wikipedia? The entire article appears to be written by Lysacek's personal publicist (it even mentions the kind of skating boots he wears, which I believe he has a financial deal to promote). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.244.219 (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)