Talk:Purple People Eater

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
An {{Infobox Single}}, {{Infobox Song}} or {{Infobox Standard}} has been requested for this article. Please select the appropriate infobox and format it according to the guidelines.

Contents

[edit] "all-star cast"

What does "all-star" mean? Apparently: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Ned Beatty & Shelley Winters. Ah yes.

[edit] bbc game?

does nobody else remember Purple People Eater as being a game for the BBC Micro? Everything2 has the tiniest mention here

[edit] picture of the waddingtons game

I'm not sure why this picture was deleted - I had full approval of the person who took it to post it, and made that clear on the upload form. Reading through the rules I thought that was all I needed to do. --PRL1973 13:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Purple-People Eater

The lyrics clearly state he eats Purple People.

"I said Mr. Purple People Eater, what's your line" "He said eatin' purple people and it sure is fine"

The only dispute I see is the fact that the 1988 film "Purple People Eater" has a Purple People-Eater.

The article should be changed to reflect this. However I think the fact that the title of the song does not reflect this should be retained.

Since people are not generally purple, and the only reason the creature gives for not eating the human is that he is 'too tough', we need to consider the possibility that he is not only one eyed and one horned, but also colour blind. We can hardly wonder that, with such evolutionary disadvantages, this extraterrestrial species is so rarely seen these days.--kscally 09:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original research tag

The discussion of whether "purple" refers to the monster or the people it eats is uncited, and has an unencyclopedic, speculative tone, so I marked it as original research. Demian12358 (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Who cares, it's funny! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.154.197.122 (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

It isn't "original research," it is good writing, of which there is way too little on Wikipedia.--Paul (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)