Talk:Pure sociology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Failed AFD
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure sociology. Johnleemk | Talk 15:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! Airumel 18:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Lack of Citations
All of the information in wikipedia articles must be available on independent websites. Articles should be cited densely enough that for any claim, it is clear which website is the source. It is especially important that contributions which dispute some aspect of the article provide direct links to websites which support their claim. RedHouse18 21:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Problems with the Criticism Section
I made a significant contribution to the Criticism section months ago. Every thing I wrote was sourced. I provided one link which was the source of every argument, fact or quote.
Since that time, one or more people have a) deleted sentences without justification b) violated NPOV and c) disputed or responded to what I contributed without providing a citation.
I am going to put some sentences that were deleted back in and delete some of the unsourced content. RedHouse18 21:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Once again someone has attempted to delete content which is relevant and backed up by a citation. This should not happen without adaquate justification. Below is the information from the history available on the censor:
02:31, 13 July 2007 66.218.56.108 (Talk) (22,268 bytes) (→Criticism - removed irrelevant POV citation) (undo)
RedHouse18 22:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)