User talk:Puckmv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Contents

[edit] Petty Fights

Re: Ann Coulter. I'm assuming you're referring to my reversion of someone who removed the "anti-arabism" note. You should note that I always revert any content blanking which lacks an edit summary. To my mind, if someone can't bother to use the edit summary to provide a justification for removing something, then their edit qualifies as vandalism. That was the only reason I reverted that edit. As to whether I believe Ann Coulter has made anti-Arab remarks, the proof seems quite clear from her repeated statements. As to whether there's a consensus among the article's editors to include that description, I have no idea and frankly couldn't care less. I will, however, continue to revert any content blankings that don't include a justification. Cheers, Kasreyn 21:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know where you get off saying I've made "generalizations" on Islam. If calling people "towelheads", as Coulter is so fond of doing, isn't anti-Arab, I don't know what is. Good day. Kasreyn 17:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Rewriting my sentence to reverse its meaning was truly a disgustingly low thing to do. Fortunately, page history is forever here. Kasreyn 00:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a week for deliberately changing Kasreyn's comments on this talk page. Do not let me catch you doing this again. It is blatant vandalism and you should consider yourself lucky that you are only being blocked for a week. The last person I saw doing this was blocked permanently. --Yamla 03:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


I'm quite sure that these two are the origin of why Wikipedia isn't even considered a source by most educated teachers. I signed up to try to add factual material, and take out the politically biased stuff. If you can't deal with that, then fine. I will continue to make this encyclopedia fair and balanced whether you whiners like it or not. Puckmv 01:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

If by "fair and balanced", you mean that you will continue to fraudulently alter signed comments that other people have left, you will be blocked permanently. --Yamla 13:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

By "fair and balanced" I don't mean by changing people's signed comments. That was childish and I realize that. The fact remains the same; I tried to take political Bias out of a page and whiney pants Kasryn had a problem with that. If I have no say what happens here at Wikipedia, then it is obviously a place for political statements. Jeez, retards, please settle down and learn to deal with it. Puckmv 15:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


Note Kasryn is a blatant liberal. I'm not sure who blocked Politician818 but it was just for the fact that he spoke against them. Be careful, this is how liberals deal with everything in the world. (revised)Puckmv 15:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

On what basis do you determine that I am a blatant liberal? I do not live in the U.S., nor have I ever lived there. I am not aware of ever having expressed a political opinion on Wikipedia. --Yamla 13:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


I know both of you are watching my page. I would like to know why Politician818 was blocked. Do you have any reason to other than trying to state the facts? Maybe having good solid evidence against you losers? Puckmv 05:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Near as I can tell, Politican818 was not blocked. Certainly, the block logs show that Politician818 has never been blocked, either by me or by Kasreyn. If Politician818 is a sockpuppet of yours or someone else, however, the account would have been collaterally blocked when the other account was blocked. Please note that sockpuppets are not allowed on Wikipedia and may cause both accounts to be blocked permanently. --Yamla 13:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your latest message, it was nice of you. I just hope we can work together on the article instead of butting heads from now on. Whatever you may think of my personal political beliefs, I honestly do want neutrality at Wikipedia, and most of my time here is spent reverting vandals. Often it's vandalism of articles on things I disagree with personally, like the page on Coulter. I've also recently started policing sourcing, which is harder but very rewarding. My current project is improving the lackluster sourcing in the article on Michael Savage. Kasreyn 08:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unsigned Comments

Perhaps you were unaware, but Wikipedia includes a method for signing your comments. It helps people know who they're talking to. Just add ~~~~ after your post, and your username and the date of your comment will be automatically added. I'd appreciate it if you would do this on my talk page. Kasreyn 17:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DSHA

Well, I'm confused as to what you mean. DSHA is not a day-care site. If that has recently changed, just site a source and I would be happy to include it. Otherwise, it is nothing more than childish vandalism to write that about a high-school you don't like. Cheers, PaddyM 20:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

No, you cannot. Unless you have legitimate criticisms, which I find to be unlikely. Why don't you try to contribute positively to the article, or find a different one to help edit? Cheers, PaddyM 03:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
These are very legitimate criticisms. I'm just not sure why you don't understand this. I'm pretty sure you're being an incompetant whinebox. Puckmv 04:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for calling PaddyM an incompetant whinebox. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. Furthermore, your claim that your edit to Divine Savior Holy Angels High School was anything other than blatant vandalism is without merit. You know the school is not a daycare centre and were deliberately introducing incorrect information to the article. I really do hope you reconsider and start contributing productively to the Wikipedia. --Yamla 04:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Listen, its not me who has been editing that page. I have been vouching to keep the edits, but nonetheless, I have not been changing anything whatsoever on that page. Check the history or whatever you little admins do and you can clearly see that it has not been me. On the personal attacks, I personally don't care whatsoever about your dictatorial policies. Karmafist's Manifesto is bullshit and I hope you little dictators keep on trying. Puckmv 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
You are right, I apologise and withdraw my complaint about vandalising the article on Divine Savior Holy Angels High School. It is clear that you were legitimately editing that article in an attempt to clean it up. Nevertheless, personal attacks are still not appropriate and the block was, therefore, legitimate. As to Karmafist's Manifesto, I have no idea what you are talking about. --Yamla 03:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Our Thoughts on Wikipedia

Wikipedia should not be taken as a credible source. I have yet to find an educated teacher who considers this dictatorial propaganda as being authentic. The repeated retaliation to my minimal outlash on oppressive administrators has left me blocked, time and time again. The majority of the it was politically based, leading to oppression due to my own beliefs.

I have no idea what your beliefs are. You are right, though, Wikipedia is not a credible source, nor does it aim to be. Wikipedia specifically aims never to be a primary source. It may, however, serve as a secondary or tertiary source. --Yamla 03:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

It should now be known that people must speak out against this oppressive leadership and rise up to REFORM Wikipedia to an Encyclopedia that will begin to be realized as factual material. Their frequent blocks and refusal to allow the most minimal of edits has caused us as a people who believe in free places and institutions to rise up. The people who are committed to my solution to this problem, please sign under here. Anyone who supports MY MANIFESTO, sign here and we will rise to great lengths and stop this oppression. Wikipedia acting as a soveriegn nation will cease to exist!!! Puckmv 02:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to help reform Wikipedia. Personal attacks are probably not the best way to start, however. And, of course, Wikipedia is not a sovereign nation. --Yamla 03:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signed

1. Support Follow me and our path to a better Wikipedia will be clear. Puckmv 02:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fact tag

Adding a fact tag is quite appropriate on article pages. However, you cannot modify someone else's signed comments on a discussion page. The proper way to ask for a citation is to add your own comment immediately afterwards. Thanks. --Yamla 22:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coulter Page

The revert was done right before the talk notification went online. It was switched back, before I could take action. I do aggree with the reasons for the removal, BTW. Have a good weekend! Rsm99833 00:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. --Yamla 14:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Next time you want to put bullcrap on my UserTalk page, tell me before you chicken out and add whatever you like. Just because you're an administrator, doesn't mean you have the power to bully people which you clearly are doing. Puckmv 15:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Please see WP:OWN and WP:UP. This page does not belong to you. You may not remove other people's current warnings from this page. --Yamla 15:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
By the way, I will unblock you if you promise not to remove current warnings from this page. --Yamla 15:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok I promise not to remove these warnings Puckmv 16:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You have been unblocked. However, the autoblock-locating tool is currently inaccessible. This means that your user account has been unblocked but your IP address may still be blocked. Please try and let me know. If you let me know your IP address, I should be able to unblock it manually. This has privacy implications, however, so you may not want to publish this. Even without the autoblock-locating tool coming back online, the IP block will expire in about 22 hours. But I'll try searching later today to see if I can find it. --Yamla 16:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alice Cooper

While I applaud your taste in music, you cannot use fair-use images such as that of Alice Cooper on your user page. Sorry. --Yamla 17:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Support

I support your philosophy on Editing in your user page, and I see a lot of admin bullying that needs to stop. Karwynn 17:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)