User talk:PTApete&co

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, PTApete&co, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

Make sure to read the style guide when formatting your article. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, Prodego talk 13:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, these links are very useful. We will be sure to contact you if we need any help PTApete&co 12:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Pure tone audiometry

Hi - welcome to Wikipedia. Good luck with your project. If you need any help with editing your article please let me know. As you wish to create the article yourselves without anyone else editing, the best thing would be to create a subpage off your user page and work on that. When the article is ready you can move it into the Wikipedia mainspace and I'll undivert the Pure tone audiometry article. I'll set up the Pure tone audiometry subpage on your user page for you. You just need to click into it, and then start editing. Any questions or problems - please let me know. SilkTork 14:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much for helping us, and for the offer of future help, which we may well need!PTApete&co 12:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Good luck with your project. SilkTork 19:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pure tone audiometry page!

Hi, we were wondering whether you would be able to undivert our page for us please, as we're happy for people to see it now even though it's still a working progress.

Thanks for your help!

PTApete&co —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PTApete&co (talk • contribs) 17:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC).

Excellent. The article is now live. I have introduced what are called wikilinks so readers can easier cross-reference information. This is done by putting [[ before the word or phrase on which wikipedia already has an article, and ]] at the end. I have also started a reference section. You will have references for your article. All you need now do is insert <ref> before the weblink to your reference, or the actual text giving deatils of the book or journal, and then </ref> at the end. I have put in a couple of images. You may introduce more and/or replace the ones I have used. You may also put in some better or additional external links. If you need any more help, let me know. SilkTork 18:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. We will need to change some of your changes, cause our page hasn't been marked by our tutor yet. We have to show it too another group next week, and then give our tutor the link the week after that. We will note them down and put them back up after it has been marked, if this is OK with you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PTApete&co (talk • contribs) 11:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC).

Now that the article is live it is open to be edited by anyone. The article is no longer yours - it belongs to the world. It would be inappropriate for you to put the article back to a prior state for your personal interest. You should direct your tutor to the article on your user page, and then show people the live article and how it has grown since you launched it. I'm sure that your tutor is only interested in marking the content of the article, not in the fact that you have put it in the open section of Wiki. If your tutor has any questions about using Wiki please direct your tutor to me. I love the idea of the project, but if your tutor wishes to use this idea again then some advice on the most appropriate way of doing it might be helpful. Regards SilkTork 11:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References

Hi. I've indicated on the live article the way to show references on Wiki. I haven't checked your sources - you guys seem to know what you are talking about. Nor have I gone through all the references - just the ones marked H. You may want to do the same thing with the other references. As you'll note, the advantage is that a reader can click on the reference number and be taken straight to the footnote or reference source. It's one of the advantages of website technology over old fashioned pen and paper! Regards SilkTork 11:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi. We our just checking the order of the refs, then we are going to change then to how you showed us. Hopefully will be done soon. PTApete&co 11:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You're doing good work. Well done SilkTork 17:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Our images have disappeared from the main page but our on own user page. They say when you click on the diagram, that we need to put a copyright tag on them I had a look at the copyright tags, but I don't know which one refers to our diagrams, and where to put the tag if I knew which one to stick on. We made the diagrams ourselves, but adapted them from Moore BC. Cochlear Hearing Loss. London: Whurr Publishers; 1998. Can you help? It's a shame to lose the diagrams, as they really help explain the text. PTApete&co 09:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I have just added a public domain tag, as one of the other groups has used this. Could you let me know if this is right? I haven't put on the image page that they were made by us but adapted from Moore, but this can be easily chnaged, and so cn the tag if I got it wrong. The tags aren't easy to understand! PTApete&co 13:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pure tone audiometry page is finished!!!

Hi.

I have added all our extras bits to the old bits & your bits. The only change we made is changing the Wiki link for "brainstem" to a Wiki link for "auditory brainstem response", as this is the procedure we were referring to, and it gives more info. Hope this is OK.

On our user page the cohclea pic was bigger. Can you see if you like the picture bigger,or as a thumb. Cause I copied and paste the text from our page into the live page, and I forgot we had made it bigger and it was originally a thumb.

There were two duplicates in ours and your external refs, so I combined them. All the others are as they were, except put the name in for Springerlink.com, as it was[1].

I even know how to do a Wiki link for a section within another page, and call it what it needs to be in the text!!! Impressive, hey!

Thanks for our award it is really cool, and for all your help.

I look forward to seeing how the page evolves from here. So technically a Wiki page is never finished!

PTApete&co 19:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Well done - I should think you guys are quite pleased with the article. You are right that an article is never finished. People will continue to tinker with it. However, I have a feeling that your article won't have much editing done to it. I have written a few articles which even a year later remain pretty much as I originally wrote them. That's very satisfying - the knowledge that nobody can better what you have done. Check back now and again and take a look at the history page to see if anyone has improved or vandalised (does happen!) your article. Warm regards SilkTork 19:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)