Talk:Psychoneuroimmunology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Neurology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neurology. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the talk page.
Start This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale
WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
B This page has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale


Contents

[edit] References

I have attempted to more fully reference the article, and to provide a little more explanation Can we remove the lack ofreference citation yet?

John D. Croft 05:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, John D. Croft: the references help. We still have some way to go on the article as a whole: the mid-section of this article is still a mess of incomplete sentences. I suspect that the original author simply copy-and-pasted some presentation slides in the first place. I did some cleanup on the early parts some time ago and stopped where I did because I didn't feel expert enough in the subject area to be able to give these sentence fragments the proper context. We still need an expert to go through and do that. Sullivan.t.j 11:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
I believe what's needed are in-line references using the <ref> tag rather than a list of citations at the bottom of article. In other words, as you summarize what's written elsewhere you would also reference it using <ref> so that people can see the orignal source for each item in the article. Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] So far, so good

I helped out a little, copyediting the prose that was already there, and individually marking the remaining things that are still slides. —Długosz 04:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I think we only need one section marking it as a list, as I am sure the multiple repetitions are redundant. I have kept one reference, and deleted the others. John D. Croft 00:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)