User talk:Pseudo daoist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pseudo_daoist. |
Contents |
[edit] Graphology Talk
Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] e-Sword Talk
Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Relgiously Orientated Distributions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.
[edit] Notes for New Users
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
[edit] Everything Else
If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Jonathon - it could be that I'm so new to Wiki and misunderstanding your edits, but I am curious why you keep undoing my changes to the "Mary Kay" page. I would like to start a dialogue, as I am simply trying to create a more balanced view of the company. Thanks OperaDivaBabe (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- The Mary Kay talk page explains why those reverts were done. jonathon (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi - thanks for the comment, but I removed the copywritten material after the original posting. If there is other material that is copyright violation, I am unaware of it - please flag it and I will remove it immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OperaDivaBabe (talk • contribs) 00:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- The material from the Just the FAQs page is also under copyright --- not to mention that it was used by Equinox International as part of their legal defense. (Look up their history, to see why the reasons outlined in the just the faqs page are flat out wrong.)
[edit] Bible Translations and Texts
Well for starters, what are you referring to?
I looked at Bible translations and Category:Bible versions and translations and neither show edits by me. I do not see what else you could mean by "Bible Translations and Texts". --Carlaude (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I moved some items from Category:Bible into the more specific Category:Christian Biblical canon and a few articles from Category:New Testament into Category:Biblical studies or other the more specific categories. Otherwise you will have to be more specific what you are looking for/at.--Carlaude (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)