Pseudo-Hegesippus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pseudo-Hegesippus is a conventional title for a fourth-century translator of the Jewish War of Flavius Josephus.

1 The translation
2 Attribution
3 References
4 Notes
5 External link

[edit] The translation

The translator worked with freedom to produce a paraphrase, curtailing and abridging here and developing there. As a whole it suggests the work of a rhetorician.

There are only five books, the first four corresponding to the first four of Josephus, but the fifth of Hegesippus combines the fifth and sixth books of Josephus, and a part of the seventh book. The authors most frequently imitated are Virgil, Sallust, and Cicero. The Bible is rarely quoted or made use of, which can be readily understood if the work is anterior to his career as preacher and bishop.

It was printed in Paris in 1510^[1]. There is an edition by C. F. Weber and J. Caesar (Marburg, 1864).

This translation of the "Bellum Judaicum" must not be confounded with that of Rufinus, which has seven books corresponding to the original, and is more literal.

[edit] Attribution

The name is based on an error. In the manuscripts of the work "Iosippus" appears quite regularly for "Josephus". From Iosippus an unintelligent reviser derived Hegesippus, which name, therefore, is merely that of the original author, ignorantly transcribed. In some manuscripts, the translator is said to be Ambrose of Milan.

The work began to circulate about the time of the death of Ambrose, the Bishop of Milan (398), or shortly after. A letter of St. Jerome (Epist lxxi), written between 386 and 400, bears witness to this. But there is nothing to prove thatAmbrose wrote this work at the end of his life. The various allusions, notably that to the conquest of Britain by Theodosius (c. 370) are more readily explained if it is an earlier work.

[edit] References

Against the attribution to St. Ambrose:

Vogel, De Hegesippo qui dicitur Iosephi interprete (Munich, 1880);
Klebs, Festschrift für Friedländer (1895), 210.

For the attribution:

Ihm, Studia Ambrosiana (Leipzig, 1889), 62;
Landgraf, Die Hegesippus Frage in Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik, XII, 465;
Ussani, La Questione e la critica del cosi detto Egesippo in Studi italiani di Filologia classica (Florence, 1906), 245.