User talk:ProfMozart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Somikano

A tag has been placed on Somikano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Moonside 09:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Everytime I write an article there is some problem. I smell conspiracy!! But seriously whats the problem? This is a widely loved story in europe, and well refrenced, sir. --ProfMozart 09:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Well perhaps you have a problem then. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary references. Article has been deleted as the citations given do not support the claims made. —Moondyne 09:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not recreate the deleted article or talk page. If you wish to discuss this further I am happy to do so, either here or on my talk page. —Moondyne 09:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

You should recreate it because it was fine. like i said well written well sourced, and i have even more sources. like i said u hould let other editors at least decide, instead of you alone. --ProfMozart 09:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

If you can provide quality references (in English) which are accessible and which support the story, I'm happy to undelete it. But frankly, it smells like a hoax, and so the onus is on you to provide same. —Moondyne 09:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

ok then undeleted and ill do it right now. and i will apologize for being lazy and not putting everything in. Im not into hoaxs. --ProfMozart 10:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid that thats not how its going to work. Above I said not to recreate the article. Take this as your final warning - the next time you create the article you will be blocked. —Moondyne 12:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


First and foremost, sir, I am not frightened, or concerned about what you have said above. Everything you have done to that article goes agenst wiki policy. Stop trying to intiminate me. --ProfMozart 13:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thousands of new articles are added to Wikipedia every day and a large percentage of them are rubbish, including yours. If we don't get rid of the rubbish, then this place will quickly turn into a rubbish tip. Have a nice day. —Moondyne 12:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

We don't need hoaxers around here, especially unapologetic ones who enjoy wasting other editors' time with pointless arguments. I will gladly unblock if you can convince me that won't try to hoax us ever again. Hesperian 13:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] How dare you

How dare you place a block on me? Are you crazy, what is this bazaro world? I am going to have to go to the higher ups, and have this problem taken care of. This is ridiculous, just ridiculous!! --ProfMozart 13:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

ProfMozart, as you clearly enjoy making stuff up, why not edit Uncyclopedia instead? Your talents may be appreciated there. Wikipedia's insistence on reliable sources and correct spelling must be getting boring for you. -- Rob C (Alarob) 15:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Or make your own Wiki, where you can make up the rules as you see fit. Don't expect a huge a membership, though, because the rest of us will happily continue to do whatever we can to keep Wikipedia crap-free and make it better in every way. Have a nice day. Adrian M. H. 16:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
You must be crazy to think that any administrator would agree with your actions and unblock you. You have on more than several occasions violated Wikipedia policy and rules or accused people of having personal problems with articles when they are simply upholding simple Wikipedia rules. If you just want to be nonconstructive go to Unencylopedia and make an account there as Rob suggested and leave Wikipedia alone unless you actually wish to make constructive articles and edits that are not nonsense. Xtreme racer 00:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unencylopedia

Wow, Thanks so much for the "Unencylopedia" link i love it. Its so fun, I have spent hours there. thanks again and sorry about any problems we have all had. I know i wasted editors time(expect for my Romano German hybrid series, that belongs here) but it was all in good fun. I think alot of my vandalizm was hilarious. reading ur replys was so much fun, i couldnt stop laughing, especially with Somikano. Nobody thought that was funny? See you later.

"The World Renown poet, scholar, and adventurer"--ProfMozart 03:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocked

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User has promised not to hoax or vandalise any more.

Request handled by: Hesperian 02:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stacy Kaiser

This article was a direct copy-paste of the biography at www.stacykaiser.com, and therefore a copyright violation. You're on very very thin ice here; don't do that again. Hesperian 23:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Stacy Kaiser. I notice that you've been previously warned for this. Failure to abide by Wikipedia's policies may result in you being banned.

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.stacykaiser.com/ in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stacy Kaiser with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Stacy Kaiser with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Stacy Kaiser saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. - Philippe | Talk 19:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dina 20:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Admins who are considering unblocking this editor are asked to read this page (especially User talk:ProfMozart#How dare you and User talk:ProfMozart#Unencylopedia) for evidence of this user's persistent frivolity. Others who have signed this page can also attest to repeated fruitless efforts to work with ProfMozart on articles that ended up deleted. Plainly it amuses him/her to make idle threats and to waste other people's time. Still, it's your call. -- Rob C (Alarob) 13:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] ProfMozart

ProfMozart is actually my cousin who lives with me and we share the same computer. We actually talked about wiki the other day and he told me about everything, all the stupid vandalism, and all the waste of peoples time. See ProfMozart drinks, and he gets drunk, goes on the computer(to surf for chicks or whatever) but also goes to wiki to read and what not.

  • Is there anyway he can be blocked without chance of ever comming back, because I dont want my name to be uncredible because of him and the computer we share.
  • Apperantly he has written real articles, however they were not up to wiki standards, but they were not lies or vandalism either. I think it would be suitable to give him one more chance, and if he cant behave, then kick him off for keeps. I'll even bar him from using my computer.

I think he deserves a chance to be part of the wiki community, and I know he is repentant. Hes not gonna drink and go online anymore anyways, because that has brought him some trouble, other then being banned from wiki. One last and final chance would be fair and just. --Sir Kindle 02:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Sir Kindle blocked indefinitely as a confirmed sockpuppet of ProfMozart. Hesperian 02:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Sir K., your story might even be true, but we would have to be exceptionally naive at this point to take you at your word. You are all out of chances. Pax vobis. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Class Act

RobC Alarob, real talk your a class act. Of all the wiki editors I have delt with your by far the coolest. --ProfMozart 03:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice.... Hesperian 03:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC) "

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Wikipedia has a code of conduct: Respect your fellow Wikipedians even when you may not agree with them. Be civil. Avoid making personal attacks or sweeping generalizations. Find consensus; avoid edit wars; follow the three-revert rule; and remember that there are 1,881,498 articles on the English Wikipedia to work on and discuss. Act in good faith, never disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, and assume good faith on the part of others. Be open and welcoming. - From the 5 pillars of Wikipedia

I promise you you will not regret unblocking me. Please let me return, I give you a 100% gaurentee you will never have a problem with me again. --ProfMozart 03:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is my last attempt, and I am sincerly asking to be unblocked. I did vandalize and I am so sorry for that because everyday I am kicking myself in the behind for getting drunk and playing on Wikipedia, take pity on an alcoholic please, I have contributed to wiki in good ways also, and have given useful insight as well. I enjoy wiki, and all the intelligence here, and I swear, I will never, ever disrespect, or vandalize, or ruin wikipedia again."

Decline reason: "Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click View source on that article.
  • Copy and paste the contents of that page at the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
  • When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. --  Netsnipe  ►  02:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

ok then thats what I will do, I have found an article that needed to be created Alan Munro(jockey).

[edit] Alan Munro

Alan Munro is a Jockey who is best known for his victories while riding the race horse Generous. Munro, 38, has been very colorful, and vocal his entire life, a trait which he admits may have been interpreted as arrogance in his youth. At the press conference after his Derby victory, already upset by earlier criticism, he told the world's media to "mind their own business". He is known for that sort of hot-headedness, and has gotten himself into trouble for it on more then one occasion. He is also known as being the first of the jockeys to introduce the American style of riding into the UK in the early 1990's.

[edit] Early Life

Munro was born in England, circa 1969. He was inspired as a child to become a jockey after seeing a profile of Steve Cauthen, who had just arrived in Britain from the United States, on John Craven's Newsround. As an apprentice he spent his winters developing his skills in the States.

[edit] Racing Career

At the beginning of his career he was average, with never really achieving much fame. It took Alan about 7 years to start living up to his racing potential, but it was Generous that changed his life. In early 1991, Alan got the oppertunity to ride in the green silks of the famous Fahd Salman. It was in June 1991, that Alan's career really took off when he took the Epsom Derby on Generous. They later defeated subsequent Arc winner Suave Dancer in the Irish Derby. They were also victorious later that year in July when they took the King George and Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Stakes.


[edit] Legal Problems

In 2005 Alan Munro was charged with a breach of the Jockey Club's rules which state that no person shall act in any violent or improper manner on any land or premises used by the Stewards or owned, used or licensed by the Stewards of the Jockey Club. After an investigation by the Security Department, the Jockey Club announced that a Disciplinary Panel enquiry will be held into Alan Munro’s behaviour towards Richard Quinn. He was eventually suspended for seven days.

[edit] Acheivements

  • 1990 - Rode Timeless Times to a record equalling 16 wins for a two-year-old in one turf season.
  • 1991 - Rode a 100 winners in a season, on turf, for the first time.
  • 1991 - Rode 6 winners in one day.
  • 1993 - Rode a winner at three different racetracks on the same day - 5th jockey to achieve this.
  • 1994 - Granted a 3 -month licence to ride in Japan - first rider to secure a contract in Japan.
  • 1995 - Club Jockey for The Royal Hong Kong Jockey Club - January to June.
  • 1995 - Granted a three-month licence to ride in Japan.
  • 1996 - Club Jockey for The Royal Hong Kong Jockey Club - January to June.
  • 1997 - Club Jockey for The Hong Kong Jockey Club - March to June.
  • 1997 - Treble at Macau whilst representing England, at their International Jockeys' Invitational Race Meeting
  • 1997 - Retained as First Jockey by S. T. Wong, 1997/98, Hong Kong
  • 1998 - Retained as First Jockey by David Oughton, 1998/99, Hong Kong
  • 1999 - Retained by The Hong Kong Jockey Club as a full season Club Jockey.

[edit] Trivia

  • Apprenticed to Barry Hills 1983-1986.
  • First ride, Newbury 1984.
  • First winner, Yarmouth 1985 - Sentimental Roses
  • Moved to Mel Brittain 1986-1989 as apprentice
  • 1990: Retained as First Jockey (still an apprentice) by W. O'Gorman.
  • 1990: Second retainer Mrs. L. Ramsden
  • 1990: March: Obtained Full Jockey Licence
  • 1991: April: Retained as First Jockey to H.R.H. Prince Fahd Salman
  • 1991-2000: Contracted to ride in Hong Kong each year.
  • 1994, 1995 & 1998: Contracted to ride in Japan
  • 1995: Contracted to ride in South Africa
  • 2000: Four year break from racing
  • 2005: Returns to the UK with highest early season winning percentage.
  • Munro is a black belt


[edit] Refrences

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]--ProfMozart 08:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I hope that is good enough for you, but I have to say I probably wont be attempting to write articles per se' being that English is my second languge. I do however wish to discuss topics on there discussion pages, and maybe help patrol for vandalism or grammer errors( where I can find them)"

Decline reason: "Please provide links to the SPECIFIC articles you used as your references. Links to domains by themselves are unsatisfactory per Wikipedia:Verifiability. You'll also need to rewrite a lot of the sections from a neutral point of view. At this time, I don't think you quite grasp core Wikipedia policies. --  Netsnipe  ►  12:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I want to know if it would just be ok, that I didnt create new articles, just discuss old ones, and search for vandalism. I dont plan on creating my own article in the near future. But I still wanna be apart of wiki--ProfMozart 21:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)}}

General help cannot help you return to Wikipedia. Those sentiments should be directed to an administrator. I am removing the help template. Thanks,

The Rhymesmith 23:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)