Talk:Prozzäk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] There's probably really no way to answer this, but...
Can Prozzak be appropriately credited with popularizing "Sucks to be you" (and various leet variants) in Canada in the late 1990s? Oh, I love the deep questions we can inquire on here. :) Samaritan 02:53, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I dunno, but I think the song is so good we can go ahead and credit them with it. - Doug the Aquacell Guy (Sunday, April 23)
- I heard the phrase before the song, but after the song it really exploded. I imagine they heard the phrase before and got the idea for the song. 68.43.152.39 01:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Prozzäk or Prozzak?
The logo says Prozzak, I can't find a single ä on the official page, the fanpage listed here or the myspace page. --BodyTag 03:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I see the other albums say Prozzäk, is it possible they have changed their name? Like Smash Mouth used to be Smashmouth. --BodyTag 20:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- In the video for "Sucks to be you", Simon and Milo are on a private yacht named "Prozzäk", so it seems the diaresis is used. I assume it's a Heavy Metal Umlaut. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.182.109 (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] missing information?
some time ago i checked this page and there was alot more infomation but now it is a stub. is there any way to find out what happend to all the infomation? - Hinro 2-10-06
We could add the information from the Legend of Simon and Milo clip. 68.95.142.252 23:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Big Change
Should it be noted how Prozzak changed from the no-neck Simon and tall muscular Milo to this dark, cynical Simon&Milo? A lot of fans were outraged by this...
- Seems to me that the entire purpose of Prozzak is to poke fun not only at modern romance, but at the goofier excesses of pop music. If this is their way of throwing emo into the pastiche, well... 65.212.93.34 20:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cruel cruel world.jpg
Image:Cruel cruel world.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)