Talk:Proverb (Reich)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Proverb (Reich) is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, cleanup, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that aren't covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
	This article is supported by the Compositions task force.

	This article falls within the scope of the WikiProject contemporary music, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of contemporary music subjects. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

An entry from Proverb (Reich) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 16 September 2006.

Proverb (Reich) was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: October 17, 2006

[edit] GA stuff

I failed this not because it's a bad article, but because it's essentially a stub. A decent start, but not up to GA level. Amongst the criteria, it doesn't really adequately explain a number of the terms it uses (no short description of hocket? No overview of the "explanation" of Reich's career?), and it's not very broad - it keeps it short and simple when a lot more could probably be said, such as with the remixes and its place within Reich's other work. Keep going, though. While there's a ways to go, I think this could turn into a good article. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)