Talk:Prostitution in Sweden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on June 19, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
WikiProject Sweden The article on Prostitution in Sweden is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Sexology and sexuality This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Sex work task force. (with unknown importance)
WikiProject on Sociology This article is supported by the Sociology WikiProject, which gives a central approach to sociology and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Prostitution in Sweden, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Only criticism?

It seems like the article only criticizes their system on the matter. Does it have any defenders? If not why does it do this way?--T. Anthony (talk) 03:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)