Talk:Proof of knowledge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, I'm just starting, and this is a complicated issue. I believe however that this is a important concept of modern cryptography, which requires some attention. I'm using it as an exercise for my technical writing skills, which may be contested, but everyone is welcome to improve on it. Markulf 23:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
It seems that completeness (termed non-triviality by Goldreich) is the same for both zero knowledge and proof of knowledge. Is this correct? It seems to me that proof of knowledge is zero knowledge with the additional property of validity (which is a stronger def of ZK soundness). Thus, ZK \subset PK. Am I correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.188.192.41 (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
