Talk:Professor Charles Kingsfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Houseman.jpg

Image:Houseman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with The Paper Chase

Definitely needs renaming, could be about half the length it is, and much of the content would be better suited to fleshing out the stub that currently is the main article. --Thespian (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Can't say I'm wild about merging. Kingsfield is a character who was used beyond the original source material, making him a candidate for his own article. Also, it would be odd to have the Paper Chase in the fictional professors category (and odd not to have Kingsfield in that category). Cheers! bd2412 T 01:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per Wikipedia:Depth. The general guideline is if a child article is being given as much or more attention as the parent article, and that parent article contains very little information, editors should merge the child into the parent until such time as the parent article is solid on it's own. -Markeer 01:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)