Talk:Professor's Cube

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Think we can get rid of the cleanup notice now? There doesn't seem to be any discussion here, so it's not evident what we should be cleaning up - but quite a bit has changed since September.

--RandomPrecision 07:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Removed it; leave a note here if you think it should be returned, and why. It seems a half-way decent article. --AlsatianRain 12:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Chances are you won't take me seriously... 2 Subject of Article 3 Wow!! 4 Retooled Version

[edit] Chances are you won't take me seriously...

And I can't really blame you. After all, I'm not really sure myself that I'm entierly serious with this question... But I wanna know anyway... How do you pronounce "282,870,942,277,741,856,536,180,333,107,150,328,293,127,731,985,672,134,721,536,000,000,000,000,000"? 217.209.222.101 23:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Two hundred eighty two trevigintillion, eight hundred seventy duovigintillion, nine hundred forty two unvigintillion, two hundred seventy seven vigintillion, seven hundred forty one novemdecillion, eight hundred fifty six octodecillion, five hundred thirty six septendecillion, one hundred eighty sexdecillion, three hundred thirty three quindecillion, one hundred seven quattuordecillion, one hundred fifty tredecillion, three hundred twenty eight duodecillion, two hundred ninety three undecillion, one hundred twenty seven decillion, seven hundred thirty one nonillion, nine hundred eighty five octillion, six hundred seventy two septillion, one hundred thirty four sextillion, seven hundred twenty one quintillion, five hundred thirty six quadrillion. Mewchu11 05:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Sweet! Have a cookie Mewchu11! ^_^ 81.228.148.16 22:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Subject of Article

Is the subject of the article mechanical cubic 5x5x5 puzzles or is it specifically the Rubik's brand of 5x5x5 puzzles? Paiev (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

• All cubic 5x5x5's, but most people have only heard of "rubik", so out of simplicity we just say rubik 70.237.234.59 (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wow!!

I've got the 3*3*3 cube but the 5*5*5 cube is amazing I mean I can only solve one side of the 3*3*3 cube!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.8.181 (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Thank on behalf of the cubing community- 70.237.139.129 (talk) 07:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Retooled Version

When was the new retooled version of the rubik's cube released? Which one moves better the original or the retooled (Master King (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC))

I think Summer 2007, but probably earlier. And it depends how you lube it, and break it in —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwiki (talk • contribs) 04:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)