Talk:Pro Caelio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

putting the full latin text in the article seems a little excessive seeing as the external link to an english version (perseus project) brings you literally one click away from the latin text.

-- I agree wholeheartedly,but I also say that some examples could really spruce up the article. If it is permitted, I shoudl like to try and edit the text to illustrate the important parts of the Pro Caelio. --Articuno1 01:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Do you still have plans to do this? If so, when? I think it really needs to be edited. Deb 21:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Sorry bout that, I guess I just forgot about it. I dont know if I have the time any more, because me real life Latin classes are draggin it al out of me.. so I might help but I can't do the complete overhaul I was planning. Articuno1 02:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I decided to go ahead and remove the entire text. I'm not opposed to people adding important portions, however. 69.137.234.44 00:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Move to Wikisource

Please be sure to put this at s:la:Pro Caelio as the links on the template lead to the English Wikisource.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 16:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Whilst I can see that it may be a little excessive putting the latin text on here, to be honest the only people who will search for Pro Caelio and use this article are those who are studying the works of Cicero or the Pro Caelio itself. Therefore having a copy of the text on Wikipedia can be extremeley useful for those who need it.--Lockster2004 20:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

How many encyclopedias do that though? OsFan 21:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

But the text isn't actually there; I'm going to remove the template. 84.64.119.75 14:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I would say that someone should copy and paste this into wikisource. It's pointless that it be here. It only makes the page bigger and it seems to have no other purpose than to lengthen the space between the article itself and the references. It's absurd that it's here. It should be at wikisource (which people that are familliar to wikipedia will go directly to) so it won't be a surprise to see it here.

--Agreatguy6 03:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)