Proper forcing axiom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the mathematical field of set theory, the proper forcing axiom (PFA) is a significant strengthening of Martin's axiom, where forcings with the countable chain condition (ccc) are replaced by proper forcings.

Contents 1 Statement 2 Consequences 3 Consistency strength 4 Other forcing axioms 5 References

[edit] Statement

A forcing or partially ordered set P is proper if for all regular uncountable cardinals λ, forcing with P preserves stationary subsets of [λ]^ω.

The proper forcing axiom asserts that if P is proper and D_α is a dense subset of P for each α<ω₁, then there is a filter G⊆P such that D_α ∩ G is nonempty for all α<ω₁.

The class of proper forcings, to which PFA can be applied, is rather large. For example, standard arguments show that if P is ccc or ω-closed, then P is proper. If P is a countable support iteration of proper forcings, then P is proper. In general, proper forcings preserve .

[edit] Consequences

PFA directly implies its version for ccc forcings, Martin's axiom. In cardinal arithmetic, PFA implies . An especially notable consequence proved by John R. Steel is that the axiom of determinacy holds in L(R), the smallest inner model containing the real numbers. Another consequence is the failure of square principles and hence existence of inner models with many Woodin cardinals.

[edit] Consistency strength

If there is a supercompact cardinal, then there is a model of set theory in which PFA holds. The proof uses the fact that proper forcings are preserved under countable support iteration, and the fact that if κ is supercompact, then there exists a Laver function for κ.

It is not yet known how much large cardinal strength comes from PFA.

[edit] Other forcing axioms

The bounded proper forcing axiom (BPFA) is a weaker variant of PFA which instead of arbitrary dense subsets applies only to maximal antichains of size ω₁. Martin's maximum is the strongest possible version of a forcing axiom.

Forcing axioms are viable candidates for extending the axioms of set theory as an alternative to large cardinal axioms.

[edit] References

• Jech, Thomas (2002). Set theory, third millennium edition (revised and expanded). Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2. 
• Steel, John R. (2005). "PFA implies AD^L(R)". Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4): 1255–1296. doi:10.2178/jsl/1129642125.