Proof of Stein's example
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stein's example is an important result in decision theory. The following is an outline of its proof. The reader is referred to the main article for more information.
[edit] Sketched proof
The risk function of the decision rule is
Now consider the decision rule
where α = n − 2. We will show that d' is a better decision rule than d. The risk function is
— a quadratic in α. We may simplify the middle term by considering a general sufficiently well behaved function and using integration by parts. For any such h, for all :
(This result is known as Stein's lemma.)
Thus, if we set
then assuming h meets the "well behaved" condition (see end of proof), we have
and so
Then returning to the risk function of d' :
This quadratic in α is minimized at
giving
which of course satisfies:
- R(θ,d') < R(θ,d).
making d an inadmissible decision rule.
It remains to justify the use of
This function is not in fact very "well behaved" since it is singular at . However the function
is "well behaved", and after following the algebra through and letting one obtains the same result.