User talk:Printguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't remove tags from articles like you did from Peter Ilsted. I tagged it for accuracy because there are some glaring contradictions in the article (e.g two different birth dates). Better to discuss it on the talk page, or ask the editor who tagged it. Djcartwright 22:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I think the problem lied in the fact that I was making changes at the exact same time that you were...and our edits passed in cyberspace. Printguy 22:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Fireworks in Paris V by Tavik Simon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fireworks in Paris V by Tavik Simon.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

It's really important that, when you put comments on talk pages, you put them down in order. If you insert a comment out-of-order, it may get missed altogether, and will make it seem as if it were written months or years before the comments below it.

It's also important, when there are sections on a talk page, not to put a comment in the wrong section, as this will mean that people will assume that the comment bears upon the subject within that section, and perhaps not otherwise. You can always create a new section (at the bottom of the page!) if you feel that no existing section is has the right topic, or if the appropriate section is old enough that you don't think that it is still being read. —SlamDiego←T 21:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD/E. M. Washington

The article on E.M. Washington has been nominated for deletion.SlamDiego←T 20:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

The article survived. As a result of the consensus expressed during discussion of the proposal to delete it, I have heavily edited the article to provide foot-notes and to flesh-out the story. —SlamDiego←T 23:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)