Talk:Princess Mafalda of Savoy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Biography (Rated Start-Class) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. | ||
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu 23:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- She was Princess of Italy, dynastic names are not used for royals. see Princess Irene of the Netherlands for example. Gryffindor 07:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Mafalda Maria Elisabetta of Savoy → Princess Mafalda of Italy – Dynastic names are not used for royals Gryffindor 07:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Support (for now) What of all the other members of the House of Savoy? Charles 16:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support She wasn't a queen consort, but I think it should be at Princess Mafalda of Savoy instead. Morhange 21:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
- The Savoys all need to be moved, unless we have a case like Prince Eugene of Savoy, when it was still a separate princely sovereignty, before it became part of something bigger. Gryffindor 11:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I rarely move a page - but in this case the change made in August was absolutely and totally wrong. The children of the king of Italy (with the exception of the eldest son) never use the style "prince of Italy"; they always use the style "prince of Savoy". Anybody with even the slightest knowledge of the Italian monarchy knows this. There are a small number of English-language works which mistakenly apply the title "prince of Italy" to members of this family - in spite of the fact that the family never claimed such a title - but these works are a tiny minority. May I ask people not to make significant changes in articles about which they know comparatively little? Noel S McFerran 21:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
